Grow it · ETFs

GRPA vs AQLT

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing GRPA and AQLT. GRPA has the lower management fee at 0.25% a year, AQLT has the higher 1 year return at 5% a year, and AQLT offers the higher at 4.11%.
Lower fee
GRPA 0.25% p.a.
Higher 1 year return
AQLT 5% p.a.
Higher yield
AQLT 4.11%
Larger fund
AQLT $1.5bn

Side-by-side comparison

Metric GRPA
Global X S&P Australia GARP ETF
AQLT
BetaShares Australian Quality ETF
Snapshot
Provider
Global X
BetaShares
Tracks index
—
Solactive Australia Quality Select Index
Categories
AU, Thematic, Factor
AU, Factor, Quality
Listed since
—
2022 (4 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)
$3m
$1.5bn
Cost & income
Management fee
0.25%
0.35%
Dividend yield
0%
4.11%
Franking
55%
80%
Turnover
28%
25%
Tax drag 0.67% 0.96%
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
3.5%
net
5%
net
3-year return
—
17.6%
net
5-year return
—
—
10-year return
—
—
Risk
Volatility (3y)
—
12.2%
Volatility (5y)
—
—
Volatility (10y)
—
—
Sharpe ratio (3y)
—
1.06
Sharpe ratio (5y)
—
—
Sharpe ratio (10y)
—
—
Bid/ask spread
—
—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

GRPA Global X S&P Australia GARP ETF
  • Low-cost: a 0.25% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
  • Highly concentrated single-theme bet — keep the position size small.
AQLT BetaShares Australian Quality ETF
  • Top-25% returns over 3 years (59th of 236 ETFs we track).
  • Low-cost: a 0.35% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
  • Pricier than similar ETFs, which average around 0.34%.

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between GRPA vs AQLT?

GRPA and AQLT are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. GRPA carries the lower management fee (0.25%). Over 1 year, AQLT has delivered the higher total return (5% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - GRPA vs AQLT?

GRPA has the lower management fee at 0.25% a year, versus AQLT 0.35%.

Which has performed higher - GRPA vs AQLT?

Over the past 1 year, AQLT has delivered the higher total return at 5% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

AQLT pays the higher at 4.11%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

AQLT is the larger fund by assets ($1.5bn). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?