GRPA vs AUMF - Compare ETFs side by side

At a glance

Comparing GRPA and AUMF. GRPA has the lower management fee at 0.25% a year and AUMF offers the higher at 2.85%.

Lower fee

GRPA 0.25% p.a.

Higher yield

AUMF 2.85%

Larger fund

AUMF $146m

Side-by-side comparison

Metric	GRPA Global X S&P Australia GARP ETF	AUMF iShares Edge MSCI Australia Multifactor ETF
Snapshot
Provider	Global X	iShares
Tracks index	—	—
Categories	AU, Thematic, Factor	AU, Thematic, Factor
Listed since	—	—
Fund size (AUM)	$2m	$146m
Cost & income
Management fee	0.25%	0.3%
Dividend yield	—	2.85%
Franking	55%	75%
Turnover	28%	30%
Tax drag	0.67%	1.01%
Returns	Tax bracket - adjusts tax drag & net returns
1-year return	—	5.3% net
3-year return	—	12.2% net
5-year return	—	7.7% net
10-year return	—	—
Risk
Volatility (3y)	—	11.1%
Volatility (5y)	—	12.6%
Volatility (10y)	—	—
Sharpe ratio (3y)	—	0.73
Sharpe ratio (5y)	—	0.4
Sharpe ratio (10y)	—	—
Bid/ask spread	—	—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

GRPA Global X S&P Australia GARP ETF

Low-cost: a 0.25% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.

Highly concentrated single-theme bet — keep the position size small.

Full GRPA analysis →

AUMF iShares Edge MSCI Australia Multifactor ETF

Low-cost: a 0.3% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.

Cheaper alternatives exist: GRPA.

Full AUMF analysis →

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between GRPA vs AUMF?

GRPA and AUMF are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. GRPA carries the lower management fee (0.25%). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - GRPA vs AUMF?

GRPA has the lower management fee at 0.25% a year, versus AUMF 0.3%.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

AUMF pays the higher at 2.85%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

AUMF is the larger fund by assets ($146m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

GRPA vs AQLT GRPA vs MVOL AUMF vs AQLT AUMF vs MVOL AUMF vs AQTY

← Back to all ETFs

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.