Grow it · ETFs

AQLT vs QLTY

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing AQLT and QLTY. AQLT has the lower management fee at 0.35% a year, AQLT has the higher 3 years return at 16.2% a year, and AQLT offers the higher at 4.15%.
Lower fee
AQLT 0.35% p.a.
Higher 3 years return
AQLT 16.2% p.a.
Higher yield
AQLT 4.15%
Higher risk-adjusted
AQLT Sharpe 0.96 (3y)
Lower volatility
QLTY 10.9% (3y)
Larger fund
AQLT $1.4bn

Side-by-side comparison

Metric AQLT
BetaShares Australian Quality ETF
QLTY
BetaShares Global Quality Leaders ETF
Snapshot
Provider
BetaShares
BetaShares
Tracks index
Solactive Australia Quality Select Index
iSTOXX MUTB Global ex-Australia Quality Leaders 150 Index
Categories
AU, Factor, Quality
Intl, Factor, Quality
Listed since
2022 (4 yrs)
2018 (8 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)
$1.4bn
$992m
Cost & income
Management fee
0.35%
0.35%
Dividend yield
4.15%
3.41%
Franking
80%
0%
Turnover
25%
20%
Tax drag 0.96% 1.57%
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
6.7%
net
6.5%
net
3-year return
16.2%
net
13.3%
net
5-year return
8.9%
net
10-year return
Risk
Volatility (3y)
12.3%
10.9%
Volatility (5y)
13%
Volatility (10y)
Sharpe ratio (3y)
0.96
0.84
Sharpe ratio (5y)
0.48
Sharpe ratio (10y)
Bid/ask spread

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

AQLT BetaShares Australian Quality ETF
  • Top-23% returns over 3 years (52nd of 226 ETFs we track).
  • Low-cost: a 0.35% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
  • Pricier than similar ETFs, which average around 0.34%.
QLTY BetaShares Global Quality Leaders ETF
  • Low-cost: a 0.35% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
  • Cheaper alternatives exist: GARP.

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between AQLT vs QLTY?

AQLT and QLTY are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. AQLT carries the lower management fee (0.35%). Over 3 years, AQLT has delivered the higher total return (16.2% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - AQLT vs QLTY?

AQLT has the lower management fee at 0.35% a year, versus QLTY 0.35%.

Which has performed higher - AQLT vs QLTY?

Over the past 3 years, AQLT has delivered the higher total return at 16.2% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

AQLT pays the higher at 4.15%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

AQLT is the larger fund by assets ($1.4bn). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?