AQLT vs A200 - Compare ETFs side by side

At a glance

Comparing AQLT and A200. A200 has the lower management fee at 0.04% a year, AQLT has the higher 3 years return at 16.2% a year, and AQLT offers the higher at 4.15%.

Lower fee

A200 0.04% p.a.

Higher 3 years return

AQLT 16.2% p.a.

Higher yield

AQLT 4.15%

Higher risk-adjusted

AQLT Sharpe 0.96 (3y)

Lower volatility

A200 10.7% (3y)

Larger fund

A200 $10.5bn

Side-by-side comparison

Metric	AQLT BetaShares Australian Quality ETF	A200 BetaShares Australia 200 ETF
Snapshot
Provider	BetaShares	BetaShares
Tracks index	Solactive Australia Quality Select Index	Solactive Australia 200 Index
Categories	AU, Factor, Quality	AU, Large-Cap, Market-Cap
Listed since	2022 (4 yrs)	2018 (8 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)	$1.4bn	$10.5bn
Cost & income
Management fee	0.35%	0.04%
Dividend yield	4.15%	3.24%
Franking	80%	78%
Turnover	25%	5%
Tax drag	0.96%	0.42%
Returns	Tax bracket - adjusts tax drag & net returns
1-year return	6.7% net	6.3% net
3-year return	16.2% net	10.5% net
5-year return	—	8.1% net
10-year return	—	—
Risk
Volatility (3y)	12.3%	10.7%
Volatility (5y)	—	12.4%
Volatility (10y)	—	—
Sharpe ratio (3y)	0.96	0.61
Sharpe ratio (5y)	—	0.44
Sharpe ratio (10y)	—	—
Bid/ask spread	—	—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

AQLT BetaShares Australian Quality ETF

Top-23% returns over 3 years (52nd of 226 ETFs we track).
Low-cost: a 0.35% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.

Pricier than similar ETFs, which average around 0.34%.

Full AQLT analysis →

A200 BetaShares Australia 200 ETF

Low-cost: a 0.04% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.

Cheaper alternatives exist: MQAE.

Full A200 analysis →

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between AQLT vs A200?

AQLT and A200 are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. A200 carries the lower management fee (0.04%). Over 3 years, AQLT has delivered the higher total return (16.2% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - AQLT vs A200?

A200 has the lower management fee at 0.04% a year, versus AQLT 0.35%.

Which has performed higher - AQLT vs A200?

Over the past 3 years, AQLT has delivered the higher total return at 16.2% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

AQLT pays the higher at 4.15%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

A200 is the larger fund by assets ($10.5bn). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

AQLT vs IOZ AQLT vs VAS AQLT vs QLTY AQLT vs QUAL AQLT vs MTUM AQLT vs AQTY A200 vs IOZ A200 vs VAS

← Back to all ETFs

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.