AQLT vs IOZ - Compare ETFs side by side

At a glance

Comparing AQLT and IOZ. IOZ has the lower management fee at 0.05% a year, AQLT has the higher 3 years return at 16.2% a year, and AQLT offers the higher at 4.15%.

Lower fee

IOZ 0.05% p.a.

Higher 3 years return

AQLT 16.2% p.a.

Higher yield

AQLT 4.15%

Higher risk-adjusted

AQLT Sharpe 0.96 (3y)

Lower volatility

IOZ 10.7% (3y)

Larger fund

IOZ $9.3bn

Side-by-side comparison

Metric	AQLT BetaShares Australian Quality ETF	IOZ iShares Core S&P/ASX 200 ETF
Snapshot
Provider	BetaShares	iShares
Tracks index	Solactive Australia Quality Select Index	S&P/ASX 200 Index
Categories	AU, Factor, Quality	AU, Large-Cap, Market-Cap
Listed since	2022 (4 yrs)	2010 (16 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)	$1.4bn	$9.3bn
Cost & income
Management fee	0.35%	0.05%
Dividend yield	4.15%	3.37%
Franking	80%	80%
Turnover	25%	3%
Tax drag	0.96%	0.36%
Returns	Tax bracket - adjusts tax drag & net returns
1-year return	6.7% net	5.9% net
3-year return	16.2% net	10.3% net
5-year return	—	7.9% net
10-year return	—	8.9% net
Risk
Volatility (3y)	12.3%	10.7%
Volatility (5y)	—	12.4%
Volatility (10y)	—	13.3%
Sharpe ratio (3y)	0.96	0.59
Sharpe ratio (5y)	—	0.42
Sharpe ratio (10y)	—	0.55
Bid/ask spread	—	—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

AQLT BetaShares Australian Quality ETF

Top-23% returns over 3 years (52nd of 226 ETFs we track).
Low-cost: a 0.35% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.

Pricier than similar ETFs, which average around 0.34%.

Full AQLT analysis →

IOZ iShares Core S&P/ASX 200 ETF

Low-cost: a 0.05% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.

Cheaper alternatives exist: MQAE and A200.

Full IOZ analysis →

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between AQLT vs IOZ?

AQLT and IOZ are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. IOZ carries the lower management fee (0.05%). Over 3 years, AQLT has delivered the higher total return (16.2% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - AQLT vs IOZ?

IOZ has the lower management fee at 0.05% a year, versus AQLT 0.35%.

Which has performed higher - AQLT vs IOZ?

Over the past 3 years, AQLT has delivered the higher total return at 16.2% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

AQLT pays the higher at 4.15%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

IOZ is the larger fund by assets ($9.3bn). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

AQLT vs A200 AQLT vs VAS AQLT vs QLTY AQLT vs QUAL AQLT vs MTUM AQLT vs AQTY IOZ vs STW IOZ vs VAS

← Back to all ETFs

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.