AQTY vs AQLT vs AUMF vs MVOL - Compare ETFs side by side

At a glance

Comparing AQTY, AQLT, AUMF, and MVOL. AUMF has the lowest management fee at 0.3% a year, MVOL has the highest 5 years return at 7.9% a year, and AQTY offers the highest at 4.81%.

Lowest fee

AUMF 0.3% p.a.

Highest 5 years return

MVOL 7.9% p.a.

Highest yield

AQTY 4.81%

Highest risk-adjusted

MVOL Sharpe 0.46 (5y)

Lowest volatility

MVOL 11% (5y)

Largest fund

AQLT $1.4bn

Side-by-side comparison

Metric	AQTY VanEck MSCI Australian Quality Plus ETF	AQLT BetaShares Australian Quality ETF	AUMF iShares Edge MSCI Australia Multifactor ETF	MVOL iShares Edge MSCI Australia Minimum Volatility ETF
Snapshot
Provider	VanEck	BetaShares	iShares	iShares
Tracks index	—	Solactive Australia Quality Select Index	—	—
Categories	AU, Thematic, Quality, Factor	AU, Factor, Quality	AU, Thematic, Factor	AU, Thematic, Factor
Listed since	—	2022 (4 yrs)	—	—
Fund size (AUM)	$36m	$1.4bn	$146m	$31m
Cost & income
Management fee	0.35%	0.35%	0.3%	0.3%
Dividend yield	4.81%	4.15%	2.85%	3.03%
Franking	70%	80%	75%	75%
Turnover	30%	25%	30%	15%
Tax drag	1.28%	0.96%	1.01%	0.67%
Returns	Tax bracket - adjusts tax drag & net returns
1-year return	-7.3% net	6.7% net	5.3% net	6.2% net
3-year return	2.8% net	16.2% net	12.2% net	10.6% net
5-year return	2.1% net	—	7.7% net	7.9% net
10-year return	—	—	—	—
Risk
Volatility (3y)	11.2%	12.3%	11.1%	9%
Volatility (5y)	12.4%	—	12.6%	11%
Volatility (10y)	—	—	—	—
Sharpe ratio (3y)	—	0.96	0.73	0.72
Sharpe ratio (5y)	—	—	0.4	0.46
Sharpe ratio (10y)	—	—	—	—
Bid/ask spread	—	—	—	—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

AQTY VanEck MSCI Australian Quality Plus ETF

Low-cost: a 0.35% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
Pays a useful 4.81% income yield.

Has lagged most peers over 3 years (213th of 226).

Full AQTY analysis →

AQLT BetaShares Australian Quality ETF

Top-23% returns over 3 years (52nd of 226 ETFs we track).
Low-cost: a 0.35% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.

Pricier than similar ETFs, which average around 0.34%.

Full AQLT analysis →

AUMF iShares Edge MSCI Australia Multifactor ETF

Low-cost: a 0.3% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.

Cheaper alternatives exist: GRPA.

Full AUMF analysis →

MVOL iShares Edge MSCI Australia Minimum Volatility ETF

Low-cost: a 0.3% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.

Cheaper alternatives exist: IOZ, VAS, and GRPA.

Full MVOL analysis →

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between AQTY vs AQLT vs AUMF vs MVOL?

AQTY, AQLT, AUMF, and MVOL are 4 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. AUMF carries the lowest management fee (0.3%). Over 5 years, MVOL has delivered the highest total return (7.9% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lowest fees - AQTY vs AQLT vs AUMF vs MVOL?

AUMF has the lowest management fee at 0.3% a year, versus AQTY 0.35%, AQLT 0.35%, and MVOL 0.3%.

Which has performed highest - AQTY vs AQLT vs AUMF vs MVOL?

Over the past 5 years, MVOL has delivered the highest total return at 7.9% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the highest dividend yield?

AQTY pays the highest at 4.81%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the largest and most liquid?

AQLT is the largest fund by assets ($1.4bn). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

AQLT vs IOZ AQLT vs A200 AQLT vs VAS AQLT vs QLTY AQLT vs QUAL AQLT vs MTUM AUMF vs GRPA MVOL vs VAS

← Back to all ETFs

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.