AUMF vs GRPA - Compare ETFs side by side

At a glance

Comparing AUMF and GRPA. GRPA has the lower management fee at 0.25% a year and AUMF offers the higher at 2.85%.

Lower fee

GRPA 0.25% p.a.

Higher yield

AUMF 2.85%

Larger fund

AUMF $146m

Side-by-side comparison

Metric	AUMF iShares Edge MSCI Australia Multifactor ETF	GRPA Global X S&P Australia GARP ETF
Snapshot
Provider	iShares	Global X
Tracks index	—	—
Categories	AU, Thematic, Factor	AU, Thematic, Factor
Listed since	—	—
Fund size (AUM)	$146m	$2m
Cost & income
Management fee	0.3%	0.25%
Dividend yield	2.85%	—
Franking	75%	55%
Turnover	30%	28%
Tax drag	1.01%	0.67%
Returns	Tax bracket - adjusts tax drag & net returns
1-year return	5.3% net	—
3-year return	12.2% net	—
5-year return	7.7% net	—
10-year return	—	—
Risk
Volatility (3y)	11.1%	—
Volatility (5y)	12.6%	—
Volatility (10y)	—	—
Sharpe ratio (3y)	0.73	—
Sharpe ratio (5y)	0.4	—
Sharpe ratio (10y)	—	—
Bid/ask spread	—	—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

AUMF iShares Edge MSCI Australia Multifactor ETF

Low-cost: a 0.3% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.

Cheaper alternatives exist: GRPA.

Full AUMF analysis →

GRPA Global X S&P Australia GARP ETF

Low-cost: a 0.25% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.

Highly concentrated single-theme bet — keep the position size small.

Full GRPA analysis →

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between AUMF vs GRPA?

AUMF and GRPA are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. GRPA carries the lower management fee (0.25%). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - AUMF vs GRPA?

GRPA has the lower management fee at 0.25% a year, versus AUMF 0.3%.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

AUMF pays the higher at 2.85%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

AUMF is the larger fund by assets ($146m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

AUMF vs AQLT AUMF vs MVOL AUMF vs AQTY GRPA vs AQLT GRPA vs MVOL

← Back to all ETFs

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.