PAVE vs GLIN - Compare ETFs side by side

At a glance

Comparing PAVE and GLIN. GLIN has the lower management fee at 0.15% a year, PAVE has the higher 1 year return at 5.4% a year, and GLIN offers the higher at 6.43%.

Lower fee

GLIN 0.15% p.a.

Higher 1 year return

PAVE 5.4% p.a.

Higher yield

GLIN 6.43%

Larger fund

GLIN $1.9bn

Side-by-side comparison

Metric	PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF	GLIN iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF
Snapshot
Provider	Global X	iShares
Tracks index	—	FTSE Global Core Infrastructure 50/50 Index (AUD Hedged)
Categories	Intl, Thematic, US	Intl, Thematic
Listed since	—	2023 (3 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)	$40m	$1.9bn
Cost & income
Management fee	0.46%	0.15%
Dividend yield	3.32%	6.43%
Franking	0%	0%
Turnover	—	5%
Tax drag	1.06%	2.18%
Returns	Tax bracket - adjusts tax drag & net returns
1-year return	5.4% net	4.3% net
3-year return	—	12.4% net
5-year return	—	—
10-year return	—	—
Risk
Volatility (3y)	—	10.8%
Volatility (5y)	—	—
Volatility (10y)	—	—
Sharpe ratio (3y)	—	0.76
Sharpe ratio (5y)	—	—
Sharpe ratio (10y)	—	—
Bid/ask spread	—	—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF

Cheaper alternatives exist: GLIN and IFRA.

Full PAVE analysis →

GLIN iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF

Low-cost: a 0.15% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
High 6.43% income yield — good for investors who want regular cash flow.

That income is taxed yearly at your marginal rate, so it's less efficient for higher earners.

Full GLIN analysis →

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between PAVE vs GLIN?

PAVE and GLIN are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. GLIN carries the lower management fee (0.15%). Over 1 year, PAVE has delivered the higher total return (5.4% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - PAVE vs GLIN?

GLIN has the lower management fee at 0.15% a year, versus PAVE 0.46%.

Which has performed higher - PAVE vs GLIN?

Over the past 1 year, PAVE has delivered the higher total return at 5.4% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

GLIN pays the higher at 6.43%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

GLIN is the larger fund by assets ($1.9bn). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

PAVE vs IFRA PAVE vs MICH PAVE vs VBLD GLIN vs IFRA GLIN vs MICH GLIN vs VBLD GLIN vs CIIH GLIN vs RIIF

← Back to all ETFs

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.