Grow it · ETFs

GLIN vs CIIH

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing GLIN and CIIH. GLIN has the lower management fee at 0.15% a year, GLIN has the higher 3 years return at 11.9% a year, and CIIH offers the higher at 17.46%.
Lower fee
GLIN 0.15% p.a.
Higher 3 years return
GLIN 11.9% p.a.
Higher yield
CIIH 17.46%
Higher risk-adjusted
GLIN Sharpe 0.71 (3y)
Lower volatility
GLIN 11% (3y)
Larger fund
CIIH $2.3bn

Side-by-side comparison

Metric GLIN
iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF
CIIH
ClearBridge Global Infrastructure Income (Hedged) Active ETF
Snapshot
Provider
iShares
Tracks index
FTSE Global Core Infrastructure 50/50 Index (AUD Hedged)
Categories
Intl, Thematic
Intl, Dividend, Active
Listed since
2023 (3 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)
$1.7bn
$2.3bn
Cost & income
Management fee
0.15%
1.03%
Dividend yield
5.96%
17.46%
Franking
0%
0%
Turnover
5%
Tax drag 2.03% 5.59%
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
16.1%
net
17.9%
net
3-year return
11.9%
net
9.1%
net
5-year return
4.1%
net
10-year return
3.1%
net
Risk
Volatility (3y)
11%
13.1%
Volatility (5y)
13.3%
Volatility (10y)
12.3%
Sharpe ratio (3y)
0.71
0.42
Sharpe ratio (5y)
0.13
Sharpe ratio (10y)
0.13
Bid/ask spread

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

GLIN iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF
  • Top-23% returns over 1 year (70th of 308 ETFs we track).
  • Low-cost: a 0.15% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
  • Cheaper alternatives exist: TOLL.
CIIH ClearBridge Global Infrastructure Income (Hedged) Active ETF
  • Top-20% returns over 1 year (63rd of 308 ETFs we track).
  • High 17.46% income yield — good for investors who want regular cash flow.
  • Has lagged most peers over 10 years (85th of 108).

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between GLIN vs CIIH?

GLIN and CIIH are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. GLIN carries the lower management fee (0.15%). Over 3 years, GLIN has delivered the higher total return (11.9% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - GLIN vs CIIH?

GLIN has the lower management fee at 0.15% a year, versus CIIH 1.03%.

Which has performed higher - GLIN vs CIIH?

Over the past 3 years, GLIN has delivered the higher total return at 11.9% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

CIIH pays the higher at 17.46%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

CIIH is the larger fund by assets ($2.3bn). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?