GLIN vs MICH - Compare ETFs side by side

At a glance

Comparing GLIN and MICH. GLIN has the lower management fee at 0.15% a year and GLIN offers the higher at 6.43%.

Lower fee

GLIN 0.15% p.a.

Higher yield

GLIN 6.43%

Larger fund

GLIN $1.9bn

Side-by-side comparison

Metric	GLIN iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF	MICH Magellan Infrastructure Fund (Currency Hedged)
Snapshot
Provider	iShares	—
Tracks index	FTSE Global Core Infrastructure 50/50 Index (AUD Hedged)	S&P Global Infrastructure Index (AUD Hedged)
Categories	Intl, Thematic	Intl, Thematic, Active
Listed since	2023 (3 yrs)	2016 (10 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)	$1.9bn	—
Cost & income
Management fee	0.15%	1.05%
Dividend yield	6.43%	—
Franking	0%	0%
Turnover	5%	20%
Tax drag	2.18%	0.48%
Returns	Tax bracket - adjusts tax drag & net returns
1-year return	4.3% net	—
3-year return	12.4% net	—
5-year return	—	—
10-year return	—	—
Risk
Volatility (3y)	10.8%	—
Volatility (5y)	—	—
Volatility (10y)	—	—
Sharpe ratio (3y)	0.76	—
Sharpe ratio (5y)	—	—
Sharpe ratio (10y)	—	—
Bid/ask spread	—	—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

GLIN iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF

Low-cost: a 0.15% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
High 6.43% income yield — good for investors who want regular cash flow.

That income is taxed yearly at your marginal rate, so it's less efficient for higher earners.

Full GLIN analysis →

MICH Magellan Infrastructure Fund (Currency Hedged)

A 1.05% management fee is high and compounds against you over time.

Full MICH analysis →

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between GLIN vs MICH?

GLIN and MICH are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. GLIN carries the lower management fee (0.15%). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - GLIN vs MICH?

GLIN has the lower management fee at 0.15% a year, versus MICH 1.05%.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

GLIN pays the higher at 6.43%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

GLIN is the larger fund by assets ($1.9bn). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

GLIN vs IFRA GLIN vs VBLD GLIN vs CIIH GLIN vs PAVE GLIN vs RIIF GLIN vs GHIF MICH vs IFRA MICH vs VBLD

← Back to all ETFs

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.