PAVE vs IFRA - Compare ETFs side by side

At a glance

Comparing PAVE and IFRA. IFRA has the lower management fee at 0.2% a year, IFRA has the higher 1 year return at 15.8% a year, and PAVE offers the higher at 3.12%.

Lower fee

IFRA 0.2% p.a.

Higher 1 year return

IFRA 15.8% p.a.

Higher yield

PAVE 3.12%

Larger fund

IFRA $2.1bn

Side-by-side comparison

Metric	PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF	IFRA VanEck FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF
Snapshot
Provider	Global X	VanEck
Tracks index	—	FTSE Developed Core Infrastructure 50/50 Hedged into AUD Index
Categories	Intl, Thematic, US	Intl, Thematic
Listed since	—	2016 (10 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)	$35m	$2.1bn
Cost & income
Management fee	0.46%	0.2%
Dividend yield	3.12%	2.97%
Franking	0%	0%
Turnover	—	15%
Tax drag	1%	1.31%
Returns	Tax bracket - adjusts tax drag & net returns
1-year return	13.6% net	15.8% net
3-year return	—	11.7% net
5-year return	—	7.5% net
10-year return	—	7% net
Risk
Volatility (3y)	—	11%
Volatility (5y)	—	12.7%
Volatility (10y)	—	12.6%
Sharpe ratio (3y)	—	0.7
Sharpe ratio (5y)	—	0.38
Sharpe ratio (10y)	—	0.43
Bid/ask spread	—	—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF

Cheaper alternatives exist: GLIN and IFRA.

Full PAVE analysis →

IFRA VanEck FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF

Top-23% returns over 1 year (72nd of 308 ETFs we track).
Low-cost: a 0.2% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.

Cheaper alternatives exist: TOLL and GLIN.

Full IFRA analysis →

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between PAVE vs IFRA?

PAVE and IFRA are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. IFRA carries the lower management fee (0.2%). Over 1 year, IFRA has delivered the higher total return (15.8% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - PAVE vs IFRA?

IFRA has the lower management fee at 0.2% a year, versus PAVE 0.46%.

Which has performed higher - PAVE vs IFRA?

Over the past 1 year, IFRA has delivered the higher total return at 15.8% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

PAVE pays the higher at 3.12%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

IFRA is the larger fund by assets ($2.1bn). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

PAVE vs GLIN PAVE vs MICH PAVE vs VBLD IFRA vs GLIN IFRA vs MICH IFRA vs CIIH IFRA vs RIIF IFRA vs GHIF

← Back to all ETFs

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.