Grow it · ETFs

MTUM vs AQLT

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing MTUM and AQLT. MTUM has the lower management fee at 0.35% a year, AQLT has the higher 1 year return at 6.7% a year, and AQLT offers the higher at 4.15%.
Lower fee
MTUM 0.35% p.a.
Higher 1 year return
AQLT 6.7% p.a.
Higher yield
AQLT 4.15%
Larger fund
AQLT $1.4bn

Side-by-side comparison

Metric MTUM
BetaShares Australian Momentum ETF
AQLT
BetaShares Australian Quality ETF
Snapshot
Provider
BetaShares
BetaShares
Tracks index
Solactive Australia Momentum Select Index
Solactive Australia Quality Select Index
Categories
AU, Factor, Momentum
AU, Factor, Quality
Listed since
2024 (2 yrs)
2022 (4 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)
$242m
$1.4bn
Cost & income
Management fee
0.35%
0.35%
Dividend yield
2.26%
4.15%
Franking
75%
80%
Turnover
60%
25%
Tax drag 1.67% 0.96%
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
-5.1%
net
6.7%
net
3-year return
16.2%
net
5-year return
10-year return
Risk
Volatility (3y)
12.3%
Volatility (5y)
Volatility (10y)
Sharpe ratio (3y)
0.96
Sharpe ratio (5y)
Sharpe ratio (10y)
Bid/ask spread

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

MTUM BetaShares Australian Momentum ETF
  • Low-cost: a 0.35% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
  • Pricier than similar ETFs, which average around 0.34%.
AQLT BetaShares Australian Quality ETF
  • Top-23% returns over 3 years (52nd of 226 ETFs we track).
  • Low-cost: a 0.35% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
  • Pricier than similar ETFs, which average around 0.34%.

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between MTUM vs AQLT?

MTUM and AQLT are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. MTUM carries the lower management fee (0.35%). Over 1 year, AQLT has delivered the higher total return (6.7% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - MTUM vs AQLT?

MTUM has the lower management fee at 0.35% a year, versus AQLT 0.35%.

Which has performed higher - MTUM vs AQLT?

Over the past 1 year, AQLT has delivered the higher total return at 6.7% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

AQLT pays the higher at 4.15%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

AQLT is the larger fund by assets ($1.4bn). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?