At a glance
Side-by-side comparison
| Metric |
MAET
Munro Global Growth Fund Complex ETF
|
WCMQ
WCM Quality Global Growth Fund - Active ETF
|
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Provider |
—
|
—
|
| Tracks index |
—
|
MSCI All Country World ex Australia Index
|
| Categories |
Intl, Growth, Active
|
Intl, Growth, Quality, Active
|
| Listed since |
—
|
2020 (6 yrs)
|
| Fund size (AUM) |
$407m
|
—
|
| Cost & income | ||
| Management fee |
1.35%
|
1.35%
|
| Dividend yield |
—
|
—
|
| Franking |
0%
|
0%
|
| Turnover |
—
|
20%
|
| Tax drag | — | 0.48% |
| Returns |
Tax bracket
|
|
| 1-year return |
—
|
—
|
| 3-year return |
—
|
—
|
| 5-year return |
—
|
—
|
| 10-year return |
—
|
—
|
| Risk | ||
| Volatility (3y) |
—
|
—
|
| Volatility (5y) |
—
|
—
|
| Volatility (10y) |
—
|
—
|
| Sharpe ratio (3y) |
—
|
—
|
| Sharpe ratio (5y) |
—
|
—
|
| Sharpe ratio (10y) |
—
|
—
|
| Bid/ask spread |
—
|
—
|
marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.
Each fund at a glance
Frequently Asked Questions
MAET and WCMQ are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. MAET carries the lower management fee (1.35%). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.
MAET has the lower management fee at 1.35% a year, versus WCMQ 1.35%.
MAET is the larger fund by assets ($407m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.
Related comparisons
General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.