Grow it · ETFs

WCMQ vs HYGG

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing WCMQ and HYGG. HYGG has the lower management fee at 0.7% a year.
Lower fee
HYGG 0.7% p.a.

Side-by-side comparison

Metric WCMQ
WCM Quality Global Growth Fund - Active ETF
HYGG
Hyperion Global Growth Companies Fund - Active ETF
Snapshot
Provider
Tracks index
MSCI All Country World ex Australia Index
MSCI World ex Australia Index
Categories
Intl, Growth, Quality, Active
Intl, Growth
Listed since
2020 (6 yrs)
2022 (4 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)
Cost & income
Management fee
1.35%
0.7%
Dividend yield
Franking
0%
0%
Turnover
20%
15%
Tax drag 0.48% 0.36%
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
3-year return
5-year return
10-year return
Risk
Volatility (3y)
Volatility (5y)
Volatility (10y)
Sharpe ratio (3y)
Sharpe ratio (5y)
Sharpe ratio (10y)
Bid/ask spread

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

WCMQ WCM Quality Global Growth Fund - Active ETF
  • A 1.35% management fee is high and compounds against you over time.
HYGG Hyperion Global Growth Companies Fund - Active ETF
  • Pricier than similar ETFs, which average around 0.53%.

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between WCMQ vs HYGG?

WCMQ and HYGG are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. HYGG carries the lower management fee (0.7%). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - WCMQ vs HYGG?

HYGG has the lower management fee at 0.7% a year, versus WCMQ 1.35%.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?