Grow it · ETFs

MAET vs LPGD

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing MAET and LPGD. LPGD has the lower management fee at 1.2% a year.
Lower fee
LPGD 1.2% p.a.
Larger fund
LPGD $832m

Side-by-side comparison

Metric MAET
Munro Global Growth Fund Complex ETF
LPGD
Loftus Peak Global Disruption Active ETF
Snapshot
Provider
Tracks index
Categories
Intl, Growth, Active
Intl, Growth, Active
Listed since
Fund size (AUM)
$407m
$832m
Cost & income
Management fee
1.35%
1.2%
Dividend yield
Franking
0%
0%
Turnover
Tax drag
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
3-year return
5-year return
10-year return
Risk
Volatility (3y)
Volatility (5y)
Volatility (10y)
Sharpe ratio (3y)
Sharpe ratio (5y)
Sharpe ratio (10y)
Bid/ask spread

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

MAET Munro Global Growth Fund Complex ETF
  • A 1.35% management fee is high and compounds against you over time.
LPGD Loftus Peak Global Disruption Active ETF
  • A 1.2% management fee is high and compounds against you over time.

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between MAET vs LPGD?

MAET and LPGD are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. LPGD carries the lower management fee (1.2%). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - MAET vs LPGD?

LPGD has the lower management fee at 1.2% a year, versus MAET 1.35%.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

LPGD is the larger fund by assets ($832m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?