WCMQ vs FRGG - Compare ETFs side by side

At a glance

Comparing WCMQ and FRGG. FRGG has the lower management fee at 0.9% a year.

Lower fee

FRGG 0.9% p.a.

Larger fund

FRGG $175m

Side-by-side comparison

Metric	WCMQ WCM Quality Global Growth Fund - Active ETF	FRGG Franklin Global Growth Fund - Active ETF
Snapshot
Provider	—	—
Tracks index	MSCI All Country World ex Australia Index	—
Categories	Intl, Growth, Quality, Active	Intl, Growth, Active
Listed since	2020 (6 yrs)	—
Fund size (AUM)	—	$175m
Cost & income
Management fee	1.35%	0.9%
Dividend yield	—	—
Franking	0%	0%
Turnover	20%	—
Tax drag	0.48%	—
Returns	Tax bracket - adjusts tax drag & net returns
1-year return	—	—
3-year return	—	—
5-year return	—	—
10-year return	—	—
Risk
Volatility (3y)	—	—
Volatility (5y)	—	—
Volatility (10y)	—	—
Sharpe ratio (3y)	—	—
Sharpe ratio (5y)	—	—
Sharpe ratio (10y)	—	—
Bid/ask spread	—	—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

WCMQ WCM Quality Global Growth Fund - Active ETF

A 1.35% management fee is high and compounds against you over time.

Full WCMQ analysis →

FRGG Franklin Global Growth Fund - Active ETF

A 0.9% management fee is high and compounds against you over time.

Full FRGG analysis →

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between WCMQ vs FRGG?

WCMQ and FRGG are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. FRGG carries the lower management fee (0.9%). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - WCMQ vs FRGG?

FRGG has the lower management fee at 0.9% a year, versus WCMQ 1.35%.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

FRGG is the larger fund by assets ($175m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

WCMQ vs HYGG WCMQ vs QLTY WCMQ vs QUAL WCMQ vs GLOB WCMQ vs HHIF WCMQ vs LHGG FRGG vs HYGG FRGG vs LPGD

← Back to all ETFs

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.