GLIN vs PAVE - Compare ETFs side by side

At a glance

Comparing GLIN and PAVE. GLIN has the lower management fee at 0.15% a year, GLIN has the higher 1 year return at 16.1% a year, and GLIN offers the higher at 5.96%.

Lower fee

GLIN 0.15% p.a.

Higher 1 year return

GLIN 16.1% p.a.

Higher yield

GLIN 5.96%

Larger fund

GLIN $1.7bn

Side-by-side comparison

Metric	GLIN iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF	PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF
Snapshot
Provider	iShares	Global X
Tracks index	FTSE Global Core Infrastructure 50/50 Index (AUD Hedged)	—
Categories	Intl, Thematic	Intl, Thematic, US
Listed since	2023 (3 yrs)	—
Fund size (AUM)	$1.7bn	$35m
Cost & income
Management fee	0.15%	0.46%
Dividend yield	5.96%	3.12%
Franking	0%	0%
Turnover	5%	—
Tax drag	2.03%	1%
Returns	Tax bracket - adjusts tax drag & net returns
1-year return	16.1% net	13.6% net
3-year return	11.9% net	—
5-year return	—	—
10-year return	—	—
Risk
Volatility (3y)	11%	—
Volatility (5y)	—	—
Volatility (10y)	—	—
Sharpe ratio (3y)	0.71	—
Sharpe ratio (5y)	—	—
Sharpe ratio (10y)	—	—
Bid/ask spread	—	—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

GLIN iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF

Top-23% returns over 1 year (70th of 308 ETFs we track).
Low-cost: a 0.15% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.

Cheaper alternatives exist: TOLL.

Full GLIN analysis →

PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF

Cheaper alternatives exist: GLIN and IFRA.

Full PAVE analysis →

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between GLIN vs PAVE?

GLIN and PAVE are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. GLIN carries the lower management fee (0.15%). Over 1 year, GLIN has delivered the higher total return (16.1% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - GLIN vs PAVE?

GLIN has the lower management fee at 0.15% a year, versus PAVE 0.46%.

Which has performed higher - GLIN vs PAVE?

Over the past 1 year, GLIN has delivered the higher total return at 16.1% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

GLIN pays the higher at 5.96%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

GLIN is the larger fund by assets ($1.7bn). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

GLIN vs IFRA GLIN vs MICH GLIN vs CIIH GLIN vs RIIF GLIN vs GHIF GLIN vs TOLL PAVE vs IFRA PAVE vs MICH

← Back to all ETFs

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.