Grow it · ETFs

EAFZ vs IZZ

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing EAFZ and IZZ. IZZ has the lower management fee at 0.6% a year and IZZ offers the higher at 1.89%.
Lower fee
IZZ 0.6% p.a.
Higher yield
IZZ 1.89%
Larger fund
IZZ $454m

Side-by-side comparison

Metric EAFZ
Ellerston Asia Growth Fund Complex ETF
IZZ
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
Snapshot
Provider
—
iShares
Tracks index
—
FTSE China 50 Index
Categories
Asia, Growth, Active
EM, Asia, Large-Cap, Market-Cap
Listed since
—
2007 (19 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)
$42m
$454m
Cost & income
Management fee
0.95%
0.6%
Dividend yield
—
1.89%
Franking
0%
0%
Turnover
—
25%
Tax drag — 1.2%
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
—
-19.6%
net
3-year return
—
8.8%
net
5-year return
—
0.4%
net
10-year return
—
2.3%
net
Risk
Volatility (3y)
—
21.8%
Volatility (5y)
—
27.1%
Volatility (10y)
—
21.4%
Sharpe ratio (3y)
—
0.3
Sharpe ratio (5y)
—
—
Sharpe ratio (10y)
—
0.1
Bid/ask spread
—
—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

EAFZ Ellerston Asia Growth Fund Complex ETF
  • A 0.95% management fee is high and compounds against you over time.
IZZ iShares China Large-Cap ETF
  • Has lagged most peers over 1 year (308th of 318).

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between EAFZ vs IZZ?

EAFZ and IZZ are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. IZZ carries the lower management fee (0.6%). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - EAFZ vs IZZ?

IZZ has the lower management fee at 0.6% a year, versus EAFZ 0.95%.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

IZZ pays the higher at 1.89%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

IZZ is the larger fund by assets ($454m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?