At a glance
Side-by-side comparison
| Metric |
IZZ
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
|
ASAO
abrdn Sustainable Asian Opportunities Active ETF
|
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Provider |
iShares
|
—
|
| Tracks index |
FTSE China 50 Index
|
—
|
| Categories |
EM, Asia, Large-Cap, Market-Cap
|
Asia, ESG, Active
|
| Listed since |
2007 (19 yrs)
|
—
|
| Fund size (AUM) |
$454m
|
$2m
|
| Cost & income | ||
| Management fee |
0.6%
|
1.18%
|
| Dividend yield |
1.89%
|
—
|
| Franking |
0%
|
0%
|
| Turnover |
25%
|
—
|
| Tax drag | 1.2% | — |
| Returns |
Tax bracket
|
|
| 1-year return |
-19.6%
net
|
—
|
| 3-year return |
8.8%
net
|
—
|
| 5-year return |
0.4%
net
|
—
|
| 10-year return |
2.3%
net
|
—
|
| Risk | ||
| Volatility (3y) |
21.8%
|
—
|
| Volatility (5y) |
27.1%
|
—
|
| Volatility (10y) |
21.4%
|
—
|
| Sharpe ratio (3y) |
0.3
|
—
|
| Sharpe ratio (5y) |
—
|
—
|
| Sharpe ratio (10y) |
0.1
|
—
|
| Bid/ask spread |
—
|
—
|
marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.
Each fund at a glance
Frequently Asked Questions
IZZ and ASAO are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. IZZ carries the lower management fee (0.6%). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.
IZZ has the lower management fee at 0.6% a year, versus ASAO 1.18%.
IZZ pays the higher at 1.89%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.
IZZ is the larger fund by assets ($454m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.
Related comparisons
General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.