Grow it · ETFs

IZZ vs EMKT

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing IZZ and EMKT. IZZ has the lower management fee at 0.6% a year, EMKT has the higher 5 years return at 15.5% a year, and EMKT offers the higher at 13.49%.
Lower fee
IZZ 0.6% p.a.
Higher 5 years return
EMKT 15.5% p.a.
Higher yield
EMKT 13.49%
Higher risk-adjusted
EMKT Sharpe 1.15 (3y)
Lower volatility
EMKT 15.2% (5y)
Larger fund
EMKT $731m

Side-by-side comparison

Metric IZZ
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
EMKT
VanEck MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets Equity ETF
Snapshot
Provider
iShares
VanEck
Tracks index
FTSE China 50 Index
MSCI Emerging Markets Diversified Multiple-Factor Index
Categories
EM, Asia, Large-Cap, Market-Cap
EM, Factor
Listed since
2007 (19 yrs)
2018 (8 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)
$457m
$731m
Cost & income
Management fee
0.6%
0.69%
Dividend yield
1.8%
13.49%
Franking
0%
0%
Turnover
25%
30%
Tax drag 1.18% 5.04%
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
-9.4%
net
35.6%
net
3-year return
7.2%
net
24.3%
net
5-year return
0.9%
net
15.5%
net
10-year return
3.4%
net
Risk
Volatility (3y)
22.1%
16.8%
Volatility (5y)
27.1%
15.2%
Volatility (10y)
21.5%
Sharpe ratio (3y)
0.23
1.15
Sharpe ratio (5y)
0.82
Sharpe ratio (10y)
0.16
Bid/ask spread

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

IZZ iShares China Large-Cap ETF
  • Has lagged most peers over 1 year (288th of 308).
EMKT VanEck MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets Equity ETF
  • Top-6% returns over 5 years (12th of 188 ETFs we track).
  • High 13.49% income yield — good for investors who want regular cash flow.
  • Pricier than similar ETFs, which average around 0.39%.

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between IZZ vs EMKT?

IZZ and EMKT are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. IZZ carries the lower management fee (0.6%). Over 5 years, EMKT has delivered the higher total return (15.5% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - IZZ vs EMKT?

IZZ has the lower management fee at 0.6% a year, versus EMKT 0.69%.

Which has performed higher - IZZ vs EMKT?

Over the past 5 years, EMKT has delivered the higher total return at 15.5% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

EMKT pays the higher at 13.49%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

EMKT is the larger fund by assets ($731m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?