At a glance
Side-by-side comparison
| Metric |
EAFZ
Ellerston Asia Growth Fund Complex ETF
|
IAA
iShares Asia 50 ETF
|
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Provider |
—
|
iShares
|
| Tracks index |
—
|
MSCI AC Asia 50 Index
|
| Categories |
Asia, Growth, Active
|
Asia, Large-Cap, Market-Cap
|
| Listed since |
—
|
2007 (19 yrs)
|
| Fund size (AUM) |
$42m
|
$1.7bn
|
| Cost & income | ||
| Management fee |
0.95%
|
0.29%
|
| Dividend yield |
—
|
1.54%
|
| Franking |
0%
|
0%
|
| Turnover |
—
|
5%
|
| Tax drag | — | 0.61% |
| Returns |
Tax bracket
|
|
| 1-year return |
—
|
54.3%
net
|
| 3-year return |
—
|
30.8%
net
|
| 5-year return |
—
|
13.8%
net
|
| 10-year return |
—
|
14.5%
net
|
| Risk | ||
| Volatility (3y) |
—
|
21%
|
| Volatility (5y) |
—
|
22.4%
|
| Volatility (10y) |
—
|
18%
|
| Sharpe ratio (3y) |
—
|
1.2
|
| Sharpe ratio (5y) |
—
|
0.55
|
| Sharpe ratio (10y) |
—
|
0.72
|
| Bid/ask spread |
—
|
—
|
marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.
Each fund at a glance
Frequently Asked Questions
EAFZ and IAA are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. IAA carries the lower management fee (0.29%). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.
IAA has the lower management fee at 0.29% a year, versus EAFZ 0.95%.
IAA pays the higher at 1.54%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.
IAA is the larger fund by assets ($1.7bn). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.
Related comparisons
General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.