Grow it · ETFs

IFRA vs GHIF

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing IFRA and GHIF. IFRA has the lower management fee at 0.2% a year, GHIF has the higher 5 years return at 7.9% a year, and GHIF offers the higher at 4.58%.
Lower fee
IFRA 0.2% p.a.
Higher 5 years return
GHIF 7.9% p.a.
Higher yield
GHIF 4.58%
Higher risk-adjusted
IFRA Sharpe 0.38 (5y)
Lower volatility
IFRA 12.7% (5y)
Larger fund
IFRA $2.1bn

Side-by-side comparison

Metric IFRA
VanEck FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF
GHIF
Ausbil Global Essential Infrastructure Fund (Hedged) - Active ETF
Snapshot
Provider
VanEck
Tracks index
FTSE Developed Core Infrastructure 50/50 Hedged into AUD Index
Categories
Intl, Thematic
Intl, Thematic, Active
Listed since
2016 (10 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)
$2.1bn
$289m
Cost & income
Management fee
0.2%
1%
Dividend yield
2.97%
4.58%
Franking
0%
0%
Turnover
15%
Tax drag 1.31% 1.47%
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
15.8%
net
17%
net
3-year return
11.7%
net
10.9%
net
5-year return
7.5%
net
7.9%
net
10-year return
7%
net
Risk
Volatility (3y)
11%
12.4%
Volatility (5y)
12.7%
13.9%
Volatility (10y)
12.6%
Sharpe ratio (3y)
0.7
0.57
Sharpe ratio (5y)
0.38
0.38
Sharpe ratio (10y)
0.43
Bid/ask spread

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

IFRA VanEck FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF
  • Top-23% returns over 1 year (72nd of 308 ETFs we track).
  • Low-cost: a 0.2% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
  • Cheaper alternatives exist: TOLL and GLIN.
GHIF Ausbil Global Essential Infrastructure Fund (Hedged) - Active ETF
  • Top-22% returns over 1 year (67th of 308 ETFs we track).
  • Pays a useful 4.58% income yield.
  • A 1% management fee is high and compounds against you over time.

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between IFRA vs GHIF?

IFRA and GHIF are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. IFRA carries the lower management fee (0.2%). Over 5 years, GHIF has delivered the higher total return (7.9% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - IFRA vs GHIF?

IFRA has the lower management fee at 0.2% a year, versus GHIF 1%.

Which has performed higher - IFRA vs GHIF?

Over the past 5 years, GHIF has delivered the higher total return at 7.9% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

GHIF pays the higher at 4.58%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

IFRA is the larger fund by assets ($2.1bn). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?