Grow it · ETFs

MNRS vs QRE

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing MNRS and QRE. QRE has the lower management fee at 0.34% a year, QRE has the higher 10 years return at 14.7% a year, and MNRS offers the higher at 9.49%.
Lower fee
QRE 0.34% p.a.
Higher 10 years return
QRE 14.7% p.a.
Higher yield
MNRS 9.49%
Higher risk-adjusted
QRE Sharpe 0.7 (10y)
Lower volatility
QRE 19% (10y)
Larger fund
QRE $479m

Side-by-side comparison

Metric MNRS
BetaShares Global Gold Miners Currency Hedged ETF
QRE
BetaShares Australian Resources Sector ETF
Snapshot
Provider
BetaShares
BetaShares
Tracks index
Nasdaq Global ex-Australia Gold Miners Currency Hedged AUD Index
S&P/ASX 200 Resources Index
Categories
Intl, Commodities, Thematic
AU, Thematic
Listed since
2016 (10 yrs)
2011 (15 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)
$201m
$479m
Cost & income
Management fee
0.57%
0.34%
Dividend yield
9.49%
2.33%
Franking
0%
90%
Turnover
25%
18%
Tax drag 3.64% 0.57%
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
43.7%
net
43.6%
net
3-year return
35.7%
net
10.7%
net
5-year return
16.8%
net
10.5%
net
10-year return
10.8%
net
14.7%
net
Risk
Volatility (3y)
34.9%
17.6%
Volatility (5y)
32.5%
18.9%
Volatility (10y)
31.2%
19%
Sharpe ratio (3y)
0.93
0.43
Sharpe ratio (5y)
0.54
0.45
Sharpe ratio (10y)
0.41
0.7
Bid/ask spread

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

MNRS BetaShares Global Gold Miners Currency Hedged ETF
  • Top-2% returns over 3 years (4th of 226 ETFs we track).
  • High 9.49% income yield — good for investors who want regular cash flow.
  • Pricier than similar ETFs, which average around 0.46%.
QRE BetaShares Australian Resources Sector ETF
  • Top-6% returns over 1 year (18th of 308 ETFs we track).
  • Low-cost: a 0.34% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
  • Highly concentrated single-theme bet — keep the position size small.

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between MNRS vs QRE?

MNRS and QRE are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. QRE carries the lower management fee (0.34%). Over 10 years, QRE has delivered the higher total return (14.7% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - MNRS vs QRE?

QRE has the lower management fee at 0.34% a year, versus MNRS 0.57%.

Which has performed higher - MNRS vs QRE?

Over the past 10 years, QRE has delivered the higher total return at 14.7% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

MNRS pays the higher at 9.49%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

QRE is the larger fund by assets ($479m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?