Grow it · ETFs

MNRS vs SLVM

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing MNRS and SLVM. MNRS has the lower management fee at 0.57% a year and MNRS offers the higher at 9.49%.
Lower fee
MNRS 0.57% p.a.
Higher yield
MNRS 9.49%
Larger fund
MNRS $201m

Side-by-side comparison

Metric MNRS
BetaShares Global Gold Miners Currency Hedged ETF
SLVM
Global X Silver Miners ETF
Snapshot
Provider
BetaShares
Global X
Tracks index
Nasdaq Global ex-Australia Gold Miners Currency Hedged AUD Index
Categories
Intl, Commodities, Thematic
Intl, Thematic
Listed since
2016 (10 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)
$201m
$60m
Cost & income
Management fee
0.57%
0.65%
Dividend yield
9.49%
Franking
0%
0%
Turnover
25%
Tax drag 3.64%
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
43.7%
net
3-year return
35.7%
net
5-year return
16.8%
net
10-year return
10.8%
net
Risk
Volatility (3y)
34.9%
Volatility (5y)
32.5%
Volatility (10y)
31.2%
Sharpe ratio (3y)
0.93
Sharpe ratio (5y)
0.54
Sharpe ratio (10y)
0.41
Bid/ask spread

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

MNRS BetaShares Global Gold Miners Currency Hedged ETF
  • Top-2% returns over 3 years (4th of 226 ETFs we track).
  • High 9.49% income yield — good for investors who want regular cash flow.
  • Pricier than similar ETFs, which average around 0.46%.
SLVM Global X Silver Miners ETF
  • Pricier than similar ETFs, which average around 0.46%.

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between MNRS vs SLVM?

MNRS and SLVM are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. MNRS carries the lower management fee (0.57%). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - MNRS vs SLVM?

MNRS has the lower management fee at 0.57% a year, versus SLVM 0.65%.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

MNRS pays the higher at 9.49%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

MNRS is the larger fund by assets ($201m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?