Grow it · ETFs

QRE vs URNM

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing QRE and URNM. QRE has the lower management fee at 0.34% a year, URNM has the higher 3 years return at 18% a year, and URNM offers the higher at 2.61%.
Lower fee
QRE 0.34% p.a.
Higher 3 years return
URNM 18% p.a.
Higher yield
URNM 2.61%
Higher risk-adjusted
URNM Sharpe 0.5 (3y)
Lower volatility
QRE 17.6% (3y)
Larger fund
QRE $479m

Side-by-side comparison

Metric QRE
BetaShares Australian Resources Sector ETF
URNM
BetaShares Global Uranium ETF
Snapshot
Provider
BetaShares
BetaShares
Tracks index
S&P/ASX 200 Resources Index
Solactive Global Uranium Pure-Play Index
Categories
AU, Thematic
Intl, Thematic, Commodities
Listed since
2011 (15 yrs)
2022 (4 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)
$479m
$302m
Cost & income
Management fee
0.34%
0.69%
Dividend yield
2.33%
2.61%
Franking
90%
0%
Turnover
18%
30%
Tax drag 0.57% 1.56%
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
43.6%
net
11.3%
net
3-year return
10.7%
net
18%
net
5-year return
10.5%
net
10-year return
14.7%
net
Risk
Volatility (3y)
17.6%
40.1%
Volatility (5y)
18.9%
Volatility (10y)
19%
Sharpe ratio (3y)
0.43
0.5
Sharpe ratio (5y)
0.45
Sharpe ratio (10y)
0.7
Bid/ask spread

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

QRE BetaShares Australian Resources Sector ETF
  • Top-6% returns over 1 year (18th of 308 ETFs we track).
  • Low-cost: a 0.34% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
  • Highly concentrated single-theme bet — keep the position size small.
URNM BetaShares Global Uranium ETF
  • Top-15% returns over 3 years (35th of 226 ETFs we track).
  • Pricier than similar ETFs, which average around 0.46%.

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between QRE vs URNM?

QRE and URNM are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. QRE carries the lower management fee (0.34%). Over 3 years, URNM has delivered the higher total return (18% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - QRE vs URNM?

QRE has the lower management fee at 0.34% a year, versus URNM 0.69%.

Which has performed higher - QRE vs URNM?

Over the past 3 years, URNM has delivered the higher total return at 18% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

URNM pays the higher at 2.61%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

QRE is the larger fund by assets ($479m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?