Grow it · ETFs

LPGD vs FRGG

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing LPGD and FRGG. FRGG has the lower management fee at 0.9% a year.
Lower fee
FRGG 0.9% p.a.
Larger fund
LPGD $832m

Side-by-side comparison

Metric LPGD
Loftus Peak Global Disruption Active ETF
FRGG
Franklin Global Growth Fund - Active ETF
Snapshot
Provider
Tracks index
Categories
Intl, Growth, Active
Intl, Growth, Active
Listed since
Fund size (AUM)
$832m
$175m
Cost & income
Management fee
1.2%
0.9%
Dividend yield
Franking
0%
0%
Turnover
Tax drag
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
3-year return
5-year return
10-year return
Risk
Volatility (3y)
Volatility (5y)
Volatility (10y)
Sharpe ratio (3y)
Sharpe ratio (5y)
Sharpe ratio (10y)
Bid/ask spread

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

LPGD Loftus Peak Global Disruption Active ETF
  • A 1.2% management fee is high and compounds against you over time.
FRGG Franklin Global Growth Fund - Active ETF
  • A 0.9% management fee is high and compounds against you over time.

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between LPGD vs FRGG?

LPGD and FRGG are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. FRGG carries the lower management fee (0.9%). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - LPGD vs FRGG?

FRGG has the lower management fee at 0.9% a year, versus LPGD 1.2%.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

LPGD is the larger fund by assets ($832m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?