Grow it · ETFs

IZZ vs CETF

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing IZZ and CETF. IZZ has the lower management fee at 0.6% a year, CETF has the higher 10 years return at 4.3% a year, and CETF offers the higher at 1.92%.
Lower fee
IZZ 0.6% p.a.
Higher 10 years return
CETF 4.3% p.a.
Higher yield
CETF 1.92%
Higher risk-adjusted
CETF Sharpe 0.2 (10y)
Lower volatility
CETF 17.8% (10y)
Larger fund
IZZ $457m

Side-by-side comparison

Metric IZZ
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
CETF
VanEck FTSE China A50 ETF
Snapshot
Provider
iShares
VanEck
Tracks index
FTSE China 50 Index
FTSE China A50 Index
Categories
EM, Asia, Large-Cap, Market-Cap
Asia, EM
Listed since
2007 (19 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)
$457m
$34m
Cost & income
Management fee
0.6%
0.6%
Dividend yield
1.8%
1.92%
Franking
0%
0%
Turnover
25%
Tax drag 1.18% 0.61%
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
-9.4%
net
7.6%
net
3-year return
7.2%
net
6.2%
net
5-year return
0.9%
net
1.9%
net
10-year return
3.4%
net
4.3%
net
Risk
Volatility (3y)
22.1%
16.7%
Volatility (5y)
27.1%
19.3%
Volatility (10y)
21.5%
17.8%
Sharpe ratio (3y)
0.23
0.2
Sharpe ratio (5y)
Sharpe ratio (10y)
0.16
0.2
Bid/ask spread

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

IZZ iShares China Large-Cap ETF
  • Has lagged most peers over 1 year (288th of 308).
CETF VanEck FTSE China A50 ETF
  • Has lagged most peers over 5 years (149th of 188).

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between IZZ vs CETF?

IZZ and CETF are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. IZZ carries the lower management fee (0.6%). Over 10 years, CETF has delivered the higher total return (4.3% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - IZZ vs CETF?

IZZ has the lower management fee at 0.6% a year, versus CETF 0.6%.

Which has performed higher - IZZ vs CETF?

Over the past 10 years, CETF has delivered the higher total return at 4.3% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

CETF pays the higher at 1.92%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

IZZ is the larger fund by assets ($457m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?