AUMF vs MVOL - Compare ETFs side by side

At a glance

Comparing AUMF and MVOL. AUMF has the lower management fee at 0.3% a year, MVOL has the higher 5 years return at 7.9% a year, and MVOL offers the higher at 3.03%.

Lower fee

AUMF 0.3% p.a.

Higher 5 years return

MVOL 7.9% p.a.

Higher yield

MVOL 3.03%

Higher risk-adjusted

MVOL Sharpe 0.46 (5y)

Lower volatility

MVOL 11% (5y)

Larger fund

AUMF $146m

Side-by-side comparison

Metric	AUMF iShares Edge MSCI Australia Multifactor ETF	MVOL iShares Edge MSCI Australia Minimum Volatility ETF
Snapshot
Provider	iShares	iShares
Tracks index	—	—
Categories	AU, Thematic, Factor	AU, Thematic, Factor
Listed since	—	—
Fund size (AUM)	$146m	$31m
Cost & income
Management fee	0.3%	0.3%
Dividend yield	2.85%	3.03%
Franking	75%	75%
Turnover	30%	15%
Tax drag	1.01%	0.67%
Returns	Tax bracket - adjusts tax drag & net returns
1-year return	5.3% net	6.2% net
3-year return	12.2% net	10.6% net
5-year return	7.7% net	7.9% net
10-year return	—	—
Risk
Volatility (3y)	11.1%	9%
Volatility (5y)	12.6%	11%
Volatility (10y)	—	—
Sharpe ratio (3y)	0.73	0.72
Sharpe ratio (5y)	0.4	0.46
Sharpe ratio (10y)	—	—
Bid/ask spread	—	—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

AUMF iShares Edge MSCI Australia Multifactor ETF

Low-cost: a 0.3% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.

Cheaper alternatives exist: GRPA.

Full AUMF analysis →

MVOL iShares Edge MSCI Australia Minimum Volatility ETF

Low-cost: a 0.3% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.

Cheaper alternatives exist: IOZ, VAS, and GRPA.

Full MVOL analysis →

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between AUMF vs MVOL?

AUMF and MVOL are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. AUMF carries the lower management fee (0.3%). Over 5 years, MVOL has delivered the higher total return (7.9% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - AUMF vs MVOL?

AUMF has the lower management fee at 0.3% a year, versus MVOL 0.3%.

Which has performed higher - AUMF vs MVOL?

Over the past 5 years, MVOL has delivered the higher total return at 7.9% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

MVOL pays the higher at 3.03%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

AUMF is the larger fund by assets ($146m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

AUMF vs AQLT AUMF vs AQTY AUMF vs GRPA MVOL vs VAS MVOL vs IOZ MVOL vs MVW MVOL vs AQTY MVOL vs GRPA

← Back to all ETFs

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.