GGBL vs LNAS - Compare ETFs side by side

At a glance

Comparing GGBL and LNAS. GGBL has the lower management fee at 0.59% a year.

Lower fee

GGBL 0.59% p.a.

Larger fund

LNAS $93m

Side-by-side comparison

Metric	GGBL BetaShares Wealth Builder Global Shares Geared (30-40% LVR) Complex ETF	LNAS Global X Ultra Long Nasdaq 100 Complex ETF
Snapshot
Provider	BetaShares	Global X
Tracks index	—	—
Categories	Intl, Large-Cap, Geared	Intl, Geared, Tech, US, Active
Listed since	2025 (1 yr)	—
Fund size (AUM)	$82m	$93m
Cost & income
Management fee	0.59%	1%
Dividend yield	—	—
Franking	0%	0%
Turnover	15%	—
Tax drag	0.36%	—
Returns	Tax bracket - adjusts tax drag & net returns
1-year return	—	—
3-year return	—	—
5-year return	—	—
10-year return	—	—
Risk
Volatility (3y)	—	—
Volatility (5y)	—	—
Volatility (10y)	—	—
Sharpe ratio (3y)	—	—
Sharpe ratio (5y)	—	—
Sharpe ratio (10y)	—	—
Bid/ask spread	—	—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

GGBL BetaShares Wealth Builder Global Shares Geared (30-40% LVR) Complex ETF

Pricier than similar ETFs, which average around 0.49%.

Full GGBL analysis →

LNAS Global X Ultra Long Nasdaq 100 Complex ETF

A 1% management fee is high and compounds against you over time.

Full LNAS analysis →

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between GGBL vs LNAS?

GGBL and LNAS are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. GGBL carries the lower management fee (0.59%). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - GGBL vs LNAS?

GGBL has the lower management fee at 0.59% a year, versus LNAS 1%.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

LNAS is the larger fund by assets ($93m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

GGBL vs GNDQ GGBL vs GHHF GGBL vs GEAR GGBL vs BGBL GGBL vs GGUS GGBL vs MKAX LNAS vs GGUS LNAS vs GNDQ

← Back to all ETFs

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.