Grow it · ETFs

LNAS vs GGUS

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing LNAS and GGUS. LNAS has the lower management fee at 1% a year.
Lower fee
LNAS 1% p.a.
Larger fund
GGUS $427m

Side-by-side comparison

Metric LNAS
Global X Ultra Long Nasdaq 100 Complex ETF
GGUS
BetaShares Geared US Equities Currency Hedged Complex ETF
Snapshot
Provider
Global X
BetaShares
Tracks index
S&P 500 Index (AUD Hedged)
Categories
Intl, Geared, Tech, US, Active
Intl, Geared, US, Active
Listed since
Fund size (AUM)
$93m
$427m
Cost & income
Management fee
1%
2.28%
Dividend yield
Franking
0%
0%
Turnover
Tax drag
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
3-year return
5-year return
10-year return
Risk
Volatility (3y)
Volatility (5y)
Volatility (10y)
Sharpe ratio (3y)
Sharpe ratio (5y)
Sharpe ratio (10y)
Bid/ask spread

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

LNAS Global X Ultra Long Nasdaq 100 Complex ETF
  • A 1% management fee is high and compounds against you over time.
GGUS BetaShares Geared US Equities Currency Hedged Complex ETF
  • A 2.28% management fee is high and compounds against you over time.

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between LNAS vs GGUS?

LNAS and GGUS are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. LNAS carries the lower management fee (1%). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - LNAS vs GGUS?

LNAS has the lower management fee at 1% a year, versus GGUS 2.28%.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

GGUS is the larger fund by assets ($427m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?