At a glance
Side-by-side comparison
| Metric |
LNAS
Global X Ultra Long Nasdaq 100 Complex ETF
|
GNDQ
BetaShares Wealth Builder Nasdaq 100 Geared (30-40% LVR) Complex ETF
|
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Provider |
Global X
|
BetaShares
|
| Tracks index |
—
|
NASDAQ-100 Index
|
| Categories |
Intl, Geared, Tech, US, Active
|
US, Tech, Growth, Geared
|
| Listed since |
—
|
2024 (2 yrs)
|
| Fund size (AUM) |
$93m
|
$87m
|
| Cost & income | ||
| Management fee |
1%
|
0.84%
|
| Dividend yield |
—
|
1.42%
|
| Franking |
0%
|
0%
|
| Turnover |
—
|
15%
|
| Tax drag | — | 0.81% |
| Returns |
Tax bracket
|
|
| 1-year return |
—
|
24.2%
net
|
| 3-year return |
—
|
—
|
| 5-year return |
—
|
—
|
| 10-year return |
—
|
—
|
| Risk | ||
| Volatility (3y) |
—
|
—
|
| Volatility (5y) |
—
|
—
|
| Volatility (10y) |
—
|
—
|
| Sharpe ratio (3y) |
—
|
—
|
| Sharpe ratio (5y) |
—
|
—
|
| Sharpe ratio (10y) |
—
|
—
|
| Bid/ask spread |
—
|
—
|
marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.
Each fund at a glance
- A 1% management fee is high and compounds against you over time.
- Top-9% returns over 1 year (28th of 318 ETFs we track).
- A 0.84% management fee is high and compounds against you over time.
Frequently Asked Questions
LNAS and GNDQ are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. GNDQ carries the lower management fee (0.84%). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.
GNDQ has the lower management fee at 0.84% a year, versus LNAS 1%.
GNDQ pays the higher at 1.42%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.
LNAS is the larger fund by assets ($93m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.
Related comparisons
General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.