Grow it · ETFs

IAA vs IJP

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing IAA and IJP. IAA has the lower management fee at 0.29% a year, IAA has the higher 10 years return at 14.5% a year, and IJP offers the higher at 5.13%.
Lower fee
IAA 0.29% p.a.
Higher 10 years return
IAA 14.5% p.a.
Higher yield
IJP 5.13%
Higher risk-adjusted
IAA Sharpe 0.72 (10y)
Lower volatility
IJP 11% (10y)
Larger fund
IAA $1.7bn

Side-by-side comparison

Metric IAA
iShares Asia 50 ETF
IJP
iShares MSCI Japan ETF
Snapshot
Provider
iShares
iShares
Tracks index
MSCI AC Asia 50 Index
MSCI Japan Index
Categories
Asia, Large-Cap, Market-Cap
Intl, Asia, Market-Cap
Listed since
2007 (19 yrs)
2007 (19 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)
$1.7bn
$1.6bn
Cost & income
Management fee
0.29%
0.5%
Dividend yield
1.54%
5.13%
Franking
0%
0%
Turnover
5%
3%
Tax drag 0.61% 1.71%
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
54.3%
net
21.3%
net
3-year return
30.8%
net
15.3%
net
5-year return
13.8%
net
10.2%
net
10-year return
14.5%
net
9.5%
net
Risk
Volatility (3y)
21%
11.5%
Volatility (5y)
22.4%
12%
Volatility (10y)
18%
11%
Sharpe ratio (3y)
1.2
0.94
Sharpe ratio (5y)
0.55
0.61
Sharpe ratio (10y)
0.72
0.69
Bid/ask spread

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

IAA iShares Asia 50 ETF
  • Top-3% returns over 3 years (7th of 226 ETFs we track).
  • Low-cost: a 0.29% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
IJP iShares MSCI Japan ETF
  • Top-12% returns over 1 year (38th of 308 ETFs we track).
  • Pays a useful 5.13% income yield.
  • Pricier than similar ETFs, which average around 0.49%.

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between IAA vs IJP?

IAA and IJP are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. IAA carries the lower management fee (0.29%). Over 10 years, IAA has delivered the higher total return (14.5% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - IAA vs IJP?

IAA has the lower management fee at 0.29% a year, versus IJP 0.5%.

Which has performed higher - IAA vs IJP?

Over the past 10 years, IAA has delivered the higher total return at 14.5% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

IJP pays the higher at 5.13%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

IAA is the larger fund by assets ($1.7bn). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?