CIIH vs GLIN - Compare ETFs side by side

At a glance

Comparing CIIH and GLIN. GLIN has the lower management fee at 0.15% a year, GLIN has the higher 3 years return at 12.4% a year, and CIIH offers the higher at 18.63%.

Lower fee

GLIN 0.15% p.a.

Higher 3 years return

GLIN 12.4% p.a.

Higher yield

CIIH 18.63%

Higher risk-adjusted

GLIN Sharpe 0.76 (3y)

Lower volatility

GLIN 10.8% (3y)

Larger fund

CIIH $2.4bn

Side-by-side comparison

Metric	CIIH ClearBridge Global Infrastructure Income (Hedged) Active ETF	GLIN iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF
Snapshot
Provider	—	iShares
Tracks index	—	FTSE Global Core Infrastructure 50/50 Index (AUD Hedged)
Categories	Intl, Dividend, Active	Intl, Thematic
Listed since	—	2023 (3 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)	$2.4bn	$1.9bn
Cost & income
Management fee	1.03%	0.15%
Dividend yield	18.63%	6.43%
Franking	0%	0%
Turnover	—	5%
Tax drag	5.96%	2.18%
Returns	Tax bracket - adjusts tax drag & net returns
1-year return	9.2% net	4.3% net
3-year return	10.4% net	12.4% net
5-year return	2.4% net	—
10-year return	2.6% net	—
Risk
Volatility (3y)	12.7%	10.8%
Volatility (5y)	13.5%	—
Volatility (10y)	12.4%	—
Sharpe ratio (3y)	0.52	0.76
Sharpe ratio (5y)	0.13	—
Sharpe ratio (10y)	0.12	—
Bid/ask spread	—	—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

CIIH ClearBridge Global Infrastructure Income (Hedged) Active ETF

High 18.63% income yield — good for investors who want regular cash flow.

Has lagged most peers over 10 years (90th of 110).

Full CIIH analysis →

GLIN iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF

Low-cost: a 0.15% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
High 6.43% income yield — good for investors who want regular cash flow.

That income is taxed yearly at your marginal rate, so it's less efficient for higher earners.

Full GLIN analysis →

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between CIIH vs GLIN?

CIIH and GLIN are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. GLIN carries the lower management fee (0.15%). Over 3 years, GLIN has delivered the higher total return (12.4% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - CIIH vs GLIN?

GLIN has the lower management fee at 0.15% a year, versus CIIH 1.03%.

Which has performed higher - CIIH vs GLIN?

Over the past 3 years, GLIN has delivered the higher total return at 12.4% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

CIIH pays the higher at 18.63%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

CIIH is the larger fund by assets ($2.4bn). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

CIIH vs IFRA CIIH vs MICH GLIN vs IFRA GLIN vs MICH GLIN vs VBLD GLIN vs PAVE GLIN vs RIIF GLIN vs GHIF

← Back to all ETFs

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.