CETF vs IZZ vs CNEW vs DRGN - Compare ETFs side by side

At a glance

Comparing CETF, IZZ, CNEW, and DRGN. DRGN has the lowest management fee at 0.45% a year, CETF has the highest 10 years return at 4.3% a year, and DRGN offers the highest at 6.1%.

Lowest fee

DRGN 0.45% p.a.

Highest 10 years return

CETF 4.3% p.a.

Highest yield

DRGN 6.1%

Highest risk-adjusted

CETF Sharpe 0.2 (10y)

Lowest volatility

CETF 17.8% (10y)

Largest fund

IZZ $457m

Side-by-side comparison

Metric	CETF VanEck FTSE China A50 ETF	IZZ iShares China Large-Cap ETF	CNEW VanEck China New Economy ETF	DRGN Global X China Tech ETF
Snapshot
Provider	VanEck	iShares	VanEck	Global X
Tracks index	FTSE China A50 Index	FTSE China 50 Index	—	—
Categories	Asia, EM	EM, Asia, Large-Cap, Market-Cap	Asia, EM	Asia, Tech, EM
Listed since	—	2007 (19 yrs)	—	—
Fund size (AUM)	$34m	$457m	$97m	$84m
Cost & income
Management fee	0.6%	0.6%	0.95%	0.45%
Dividend yield	1.92%	1.8%	0.78%	6.1%
Franking	0%	0%	0%	0%
Turnover	—	25%	—	—
Tax drag	0.61%	1.18%	0.25%	1.95%
Returns	Tax bracket - adjusts tax drag & net returns
1-year return	7.6% net	-9.4% net	1.8% net	14.3% net
3-year return	6.2% net	7.2% net	4.2% net	—
5-year return	1.9% net	0.9% net	-1.5% net	—
10-year return	4.3% net	3.4% net	—	—
Risk
Volatility (3y)	16.7%	22.1%	21.2%	—
Volatility (5y)	19.3%	27.1%	22.1%	—
Volatility (10y)	17.8%	21.5%	—	—
Sharpe ratio (3y)	0.2	0.23	0.1	—
Sharpe ratio (5y)	—	—	—	—
Sharpe ratio (10y)	0.2	0.16	—	—
Bid/ask spread	—	—	—	—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

CETF VanEck FTSE China A50 ETF

Has lagged most peers over 5 years (149th of 188).

Full CETF analysis →

IZZ iShares China Large-Cap ETF

Has lagged most peers over 1 year (288th of 308).

Full IZZ analysis →

CNEW VanEck China New Economy ETF

Has lagged most peers over 5 years (177th of 188).

Full CNEW analysis →

DRGN Global X China Tech ETF

High 6.1% income yield — good for investors who want regular cash flow.

That income is taxed yearly at your marginal rate, so it's less efficient for higher earners.

Full DRGN analysis →

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between CETF vs IZZ vs CNEW vs DRGN?

CETF, IZZ, CNEW, and DRGN are 4 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. DRGN carries the lowest management fee (0.45%). Over 10 years, CETF has delivered the highest total return (4.3% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lowest fees - CETF vs IZZ vs CNEW vs DRGN?

DRGN has the lowest management fee at 0.45% a year, versus CETF 0.6%, IZZ 0.6%, and CNEW 0.95%.

Which has performed highest - CETF vs IZZ vs CNEW vs DRGN?

Over the past 10 years, CETF has delivered the highest total return at 4.3% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the highest dividend yield?

DRGN pays the highest at 6.1%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the largest and most liquid?

IZZ is the largest fund by assets ($457m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

IZZ vs IAA IZZ vs VAE IZZ vs VGE IZZ vs EMKT IZZ vs AVTE IZZ vs ASAO

← Back to all ETFs

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.