Grow it · ETFs

CETF vs IZZ

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing CETF and IZZ. CETF has the lower management fee at 0.6% a year, CETF has the higher 10 years return at 4.3% a year, and CETF offers the higher at 1.92%.
Lower fee
CETF 0.6% p.a.
Higher 10 years return
CETF 4.3% p.a.
Higher yield
CETF 1.92%
Higher risk-adjusted
CETF Sharpe 0.2 (10y)
Lower volatility
CETF 17.8% (10y)
Larger fund
IZZ $457m

Side-by-side comparison

Metric CETF
VanEck FTSE China A50 ETF
IZZ
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
Snapshot
Provider
VanEck
iShares
Tracks index
FTSE China A50 Index
FTSE China 50 Index
Categories
Asia, EM
EM, Asia, Large-Cap, Market-Cap
Listed since
2007 (19 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)
$34m
$457m
Cost & income
Management fee
0.6%
0.6%
Dividend yield
1.92%
1.8%
Franking
0%
0%
Turnover
25%
Tax drag 0.61% 1.18%
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
7.6%
net
-9.4%
net
3-year return
6.2%
net
7.2%
net
5-year return
1.9%
net
0.9%
net
10-year return
4.3%
net
3.4%
net
Risk
Volatility (3y)
16.7%
22.1%
Volatility (5y)
19.3%
27.1%
Volatility (10y)
17.8%
21.5%
Sharpe ratio (3y)
0.2
0.23
Sharpe ratio (5y)
Sharpe ratio (10y)
0.2
0.16
Bid/ask spread

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

CETF VanEck FTSE China A50 ETF
  • Has lagged most peers over 5 years (149th of 188).
IZZ iShares China Large-Cap ETF
  • Has lagged most peers over 1 year (288th of 308).

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between CETF vs IZZ?

CETF and IZZ are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. CETF carries the lower management fee (0.6%). Over 10 years, CETF has delivered the higher total return (4.3% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - CETF vs IZZ?

CETF has the lower management fee at 0.6% a year, versus IZZ 0.6%.

Which has performed higher - CETF vs IZZ?

Over the past 10 years, CETF has delivered the higher total return at 4.3% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

CETF pays the higher at 1.92%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

IZZ is the larger fund by assets ($457m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?