Is QSML a good ETF?
QSML is the VanEck MSCI International Small Companies Quality ETF from VanEck. We classify it under Intl, Thematic, Quality, Factor, and Small-Cap. With about $1.59 billion in assets it is a large, highly liquid fund.
On a total-return basis, QSML has delivered 7.87% a year over 5 years (ranked 88th of 188 ETFs we track), 10.65% a year over 3 years (ranked 108th of 226 ETFs we track), and 1.67% a year over 1 year (ranked 226th of 308 ETFs we track).
The management fee of 0.59% is on the higher side. For comparison, similar ETFs average around 0.46%. If cost is your priority, VISM (0.32%), AVSV (0.49%), and DGSM (0.55%) cover similar ground for less. It pays a low 0.41% yield, so most of its return must come from capital growth.
Over the past 5 years its volatility has been elevated (annualised standard deviation around 15.54%), meaning noticeably larger swings than the broad market. Its 5-year Sharpe ratio of 0.36 is weak — that's the return it has earned per unit of risk taken (higher is better).
Things to watch
- Pricier than similar ETFs, which average around 0.46%.
- Cheaper alternatives exist: VISM, AVSV, and DGSM.
- Weak risk-adjusted returns (5-year Sharpe ratio 0.36).
- Highly concentrated single-theme bet — keep the position size small.
Good to know
- Low 0.41% yield — this is a growth-oriented fund, not an income play.
What QSML's categories mean for you
How each category this ETF belongs to tends to behave across market cycles.
Global and international shares from outside Australia — broadening you into thousands of companies and the sectors (tech, healthcare) the local market lacks.
- Market regime
- Essential diversification away from the bank-and-resources-heavy ASX. Unhedged versions carry currency risk; hedged versions remove it at a small cost.
- In a portfolio
- A core holding for almost every long-term Australian portfolio.
A concentrated bet on a single trend — AI, battery tech, cybersecurity, robotics and the like. High conviction, high concentration, and often high fees.
- Market regime
- Frequently launched after a theme is already hot, which has historically been a poor entry point. Expect very large swings in both directions.
- In a portfolio
- A small satellite position at most. Treat it as a speculative tilt, never as a core holding.
Companies with strong balance sheets, stable earnings and high return on equity. A defensive-leaning factor that tends to compound steadily.
- Market regime
- Holds up comparatively well in downturns and uncertain markets; can lag during sharp 'junk rallies' off market bottoms when the riskiest stocks surge.
- In a portfolio
- A reliable long-term core or tilt for investors who prize resilience and steady compounding.
Tilts toward academically-backed drivers of return — value, quality, momentum, size or low volatility — aiming to beat plain market-cap weighting over a full cycle.
- Market regime
- Any single factor can underperform the broad market for years before rewarding patient holders. Multi-factor funds smooth this out somewhat.
- In a portfolio
- A long-term tilt that demands discipline: the edge only shows up if you hold through the inevitable lean stretches.
Smaller companies, which historically carry a long-run 'size premium' alongside greater volatility and lower liquidity.
- Market regime
- Tends to lead early in economic recoveries and falls hardest in recessions and credit crunches, as smaller firms are more economically sensitive.
- In a portfolio
- A long-horizon satellite tilt for extra growth — expect a bumpier ride than large-cap and broad-market funds.
General information only, generated from the fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.