WWWW vs CLDD - Compare ETFs side by side

At a glance

Comparing WWWW and CLDD. WWWW has the lower management fee at 0.17% a year, WWWW has the higher 1 year return at 15.3% a year, and WWWW offers the higher at 0.64%.

Lower fee

WWWW 0.17% p.a.

Higher 1 year return

WWWW 15.3% p.a.

Higher yield

WWWW 0.64%

Larger fund

CLDD $43m

Side-by-side comparison

Metric	WWWW ETFS US Technology ETF	CLDD BetaShares Cloud Computing ETF
Snapshot
Provider	—	BetaShares
Tracks index	—	Indxx Global Cloud Computing Index
Categories	Intl, Thematic, Tech, US	Intl, Thematic, Tech
Listed since	—	—
Fund size (AUM)	$24m	$43m
Cost & income
Management fee	0.17%	0.67%
Dividend yield	0.64%	0%
Franking	0%	0%
Turnover	—	—
Tax drag	0.2%	0%
Returns	Tax bracket - adjusts tax drag & net returns
1-year return	15.3% net	1.6% net
3-year return	—	4.3% net
5-year return	—	-1.2% net
10-year return	—	—
Risk
Volatility (3y)	—	26%
Volatility (5y)	—	24.4%
Volatility (10y)	—	—
Sharpe ratio (3y)	—	0.13
Sharpe ratio (5y)	—	—
Sharpe ratio (10y)	—	—
Bid/ask spread	—	—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

WWWW ETFS US Technology ETF

Low-cost: a 0.17% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.

Highly concentrated single-theme bet — keep the position size small.

Full WWWW analysis →

CLDD BetaShares Cloud Computing ETF

Has lagged most peers over 5 years (175th of 188).

Full CLDD analysis →

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between WWWW vs CLDD?

WWWW and CLDD are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. WWWW carries the lower management fee (0.17%). Over 1 year, WWWW has delivered the higher total return (15.3% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - WWWW vs CLDD?

WWWW has the lower management fee at 0.17% a year, versus CLDD 0.67%.

Which has performed higher - WWWW vs CLDD?

Over the past 1 year, WWWW has delivered the higher total return at 15.3% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

WWWW pays the higher at 0.64%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

CLDD is the larger fund by assets ($43m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

WWWW vs TECH WWWW vs FANG WWWW vs NDQ WWWW vs CRYP WWWW vs QYLD WWWW vs FHNG CLDD vs TECH CLDD vs FANG

← Back to all ETFs

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.