Grow it · ETFs

CLDD vs FANG

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing CLDD and FANG. FANG has the lower management fee at 0.35% a year, FANG has the higher 5 years return at 20.3% a year, and FANG offers the higher at 7.01%.
Lower fee
FANG 0.35% p.a.
Higher 5 years return
FANG 20.3% p.a.
Higher yield
FANG 7.01%
Higher risk-adjusted
FANG Sharpe 1.04 (3y)
Lower volatility
CLDD 24.4% (5y)
Larger fund
FANG $1.6bn

Side-by-side comparison

Metric CLDD
BetaShares Cloud Computing ETF
FANG
Global X FANG+ ETF
Snapshot
Provider
BetaShares
Global X
Tracks index
Indxx Global Cloud Computing Index
NYSE FANG+ Index
Categories
Intl, Thematic, Tech
US, Tech, Growth, Thematic
Listed since
2020 (6 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)
$43m
$1.6bn
Cost & income
Management fee
0.67%
0.35%
Dividend yield
0%
7.01%
Franking
0%
0%
Turnover
30%
Tax drag 0% 2.96%
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
1.6%
net
3.9%
net
3-year return
4.3%
net
27.1%
net
5-year return
-1.2%
net
20.3%
net
10-year return
Risk
Volatility (3y)
26%
21.6%
Volatility (5y)
24.4%
24.6%
Volatility (10y)
Sharpe ratio (3y)
0.13
1.04
Sharpe ratio (5y)
0.75
Sharpe ratio (10y)
Bid/ask spread

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

CLDD BetaShares Cloud Computing ETF
  • Has lagged most peers over 5 years (175th of 188).
FANG Global X FANG+ ETF
  • Top-2% returns over 5 years (3rd of 188 ETFs we track).
  • Low-cost: a 0.35% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
  • That income is taxed yearly at your marginal rate, so it's less efficient for higher earners.

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between CLDD vs FANG?

CLDD and FANG are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. FANG carries the lower management fee (0.35%). Over 5 years, FANG has delivered the higher total return (20.3% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - CLDD vs FANG?

FANG has the lower management fee at 0.35% a year, versus CLDD 0.67%.

Which has performed higher - CLDD vs FANG?

Over the past 5 years, FANG has delivered the higher total return at 20.3% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

FANG pays the higher at 7.01%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

FANG is the larger fund by assets ($1.6bn). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?