Grow it · ETFs

VAS vs FHCO

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing VAS and FHCO. VAS has the lower management fee at 0.07% a year, VAS has the higher 1 year return at 2.3% a year, and FHCO offers the higher at 15.62%.
Lower fee
VAS 0.07% p.a.
Higher 1 year return
VAS 2.3% p.a.
Higher yield
FHCO 15.62%
Larger fund
VAS $26.7bn

Side-by-side comparison

Metric VAS
Vanguard Australian Shares Index ETF
FHCO
Fidelity Australian High Conviction Active ETF
Snapshot
Provider
Vanguard
Fidelity
Tracks index
S&P/ASX 300 Index
—
Categories
AU, Large-Cap, Market-Cap
AU, Active
Listed since
2009 (17 yrs)
—
Fund size (AUM)
$26.7bn
$3m
Cost & income
Management fee
0.07%
0.85%
Dividend yield
2.95%
15.62%
Franking
75%
70%
Turnover
4%
25%
Tax drag 0.4% 2.41%
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
2.3%
net
-8.3%
net
3-year return
11.3%
net
—
5-year return
7.4%
net
—
10-year return
8.9%
net
—
Risk
Volatility (3y)
10.6%
—
Volatility (5y)
12.5%
—
Volatility (10y)
13.4%
—
Sharpe ratio (3y)
0.68
—
Sharpe ratio (5y)
0.37
—
Sharpe ratio (10y)
0.54
—
Bid/ask spread
—
—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

VAS Vanguard Australian Shares Index ETF
  • Low-cost: a 0.07% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
  • Cheaper alternatives exist: MQAE, A200, and IOZ.
FHCO Fidelity Australian High Conviction Active ETF
  • High 15.62% income yield — good for investors who want regular cash flow.
  • A 0.85% management fee is high and compounds against you over time.

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between VAS vs FHCO?

VAS and FHCO are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. VAS carries the lower management fee (0.07%). Over 1 year, VAS has delivered the higher total return (2.3% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - VAS vs FHCO?

VAS has the lower management fee at 0.07% a year, versus FHCO 0.85%.

Which has performed higher - VAS vs FHCO?

Over the past 1 year, VAS has delivered the higher total return at 2.3% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

FHCO pays the higher at 15.62%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

VAS is the larger fund by assets ($26.7bn). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?