FHCO vs MQAE - Compare ETFs side by side

At a glance

Comparing FHCO and MQAE. MQAE has the lower management fee at 0.03% a year, MQAE has the higher 1 year return at 5.5% a year, and FHCO offers the higher at 15.62%.

Lower fee

MQAE 0.03% p.a.

Higher 1 year return

MQAE 5.5% p.a.

Higher yield

FHCO 15.62%

Larger fund

MQAE $1.2bn

Side-by-side comparison

Metric	FHCO Fidelity Australian High Conviction Active ETF	MQAE Macquarie Core Australian Equity Active ETF
Snapshot
Provider	Fidelity	—
Tracks index	—	S&P/ASX 200 Index
Categories	AU, Active	AU, Large-Cap
Listed since	—	2023 (3 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)	$2m	$1.2bn
Cost & income
Management fee	0.85%	0.03%
Dividend yield	15.62%	2.55%
Franking	70%	78%
Turnover	25%	55%
Tax drag	2.41%	1.56%
Returns	Tax bracket - adjusts tax drag & net returns
1-year return	-4.1% net	5.5% net
3-year return	—	—
5-year return	—	—
10-year return	—	—
Risk
Volatility (3y)	—	—
Volatility (5y)	—	—
Volatility (10y)	—	—
Sharpe ratio (3y)	—	—
Sharpe ratio (5y)	—	—
Sharpe ratio (10y)	—	—
Bid/ask spread	—	—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

FHCO Fidelity Australian High Conviction Active ETF

High 15.62% income yield — good for investors who want regular cash flow.

A 0.85% management fee is high and compounds against you over time.

Full FHCO analysis →

MQAE Macquarie Core Australian Equity Active ETF

Low-cost: a 0.03% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.

High portfolio turnover (55% a year) means frequent trading that realises capital gains, adding tax drag — less efficient than a low-turnover index fund.

Full MQAE analysis →

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between FHCO vs MQAE?

FHCO and MQAE are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. MQAE carries the lower management fee (0.03%). Over 1 year, MQAE has delivered the higher total return (5.5% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - FHCO vs MQAE?

MQAE has the lower management fee at 0.03% a year, versus FHCO 0.85%.

Which has performed higher - FHCO vs MQAE?

Over the past 1 year, MQAE has delivered the higher total return at 5.5% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

FHCO pays the higher at 15.62%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

MQAE is the larger fund by assets ($1.2bn). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

FHCO vs DACE FHCO vs VAS FHCO vs IOZ MQAE vs DACE MQAE vs IOZ MQAE vs STW MQAE vs VAS MQAE vs A200

← Back to all ETFs

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.