Grow it · ETFs

VAF vs WBND

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing VAF and WBND. VAF has the lower management fee at 0.1% a year, WBND has the higher 1 year return at 1.8% a year, and WBND offers the higher at 3.39%.
Lower fee
VAF 0.1% p.a.
Higher 1 year return
WBND 1.8% p.a.
Higher yield
WBND 3.39%
Larger fund
VAF $3.8bn

Side-by-side comparison

Metric VAF
Vanguard Australian Fixed Interest Index ETF
WBND
BetaShares Global Aggregate Bond Currency Hedged ETF
Snapshot
Provider
Vanguard
BetaShares
Tracks index
Bloomberg AusBond Composite 0+ Yr Index
Categories
AU, Bonds
Bonds, AU
Listed since
2012 (14 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)
$3.8bn
$694m
Cost & income
Management fee
0.1%
0.19%
Dividend yield
3.24%
3.39%
Franking
0%
0%
Turnover
30%
30%
Tax drag 1.76% 1.8%
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
1%
net
1.8%
net
3-year return
3.6%
net
5-year return
-0.2%
net
10-year return
1.5%
net
Risk
Volatility (3y)
4%
Volatility (5y)
5.4%
Volatility (10y)
4.5%
Sharpe ratio (3y)
Sharpe ratio (5y)
Sharpe ratio (10y)
Bid/ask spread

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

VAF Vanguard Australian Fixed Interest Index ETF
  • Low-cost: a 0.1% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
  • Low volatility (4.45% over 10 years) for a smoother ride.
  • Has lagged most peers over 10 years (97th of 108).
WBND BetaShares Global Aggregate Bond Currency Hedged ETF
  • Low-cost: a 0.19% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
  • Cheaper alternatives exist: IAF, VAF, and AGGG.

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between VAF vs WBND?

VAF and WBND are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. VAF carries the lower management fee (0.1%). Over 1 year, WBND has delivered the higher total return (1.8% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - VAF vs WBND?

VAF has the lower management fee at 0.1% a year, versus WBND 0.19%.

Which has performed higher - VAF vs WBND?

Over the past 1 year, WBND has delivered the higher total return at 1.8% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

WBND pays the higher at 3.39%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

VAF is the larger fund by assets ($3.8bn). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?