Grow it · ETFs

WBND vs IAF

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing WBND and IAF. IAF has the lower management fee at 0.1% a year, IAF has the higher 1 year return at -0.5% a year, and WBND offers the higher at 3.44%.
Lower fee
IAF 0.1% p.a.
Higher 1 year return
IAF -0.5% p.a.
Higher yield
WBND 3.44%
Larger fund
IAF $3.7bn

Side-by-side comparison

Metric WBND
BetaShares Global Aggregate Bond Currency Hedged ETF
IAF
iShares Core Composite Bond ETF
Snapshot
Provider
BetaShares
iShares
Tracks index
—
Bloomberg AusBond Composite 0+ Yr Index
Categories
Bonds, AU
AU, Bonds
Listed since
—
2012 (14 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)
$769m
$3.7bn
Cost & income
Management fee
0.19%
0.1%
Dividend yield
3.44%
3.18%
Franking
0%
0%
Turnover
30%
35%
Tax drag 1.82% 1.86%
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
-0.9%
net
-0.5%
net
3-year return
—
3.5%
net
5-year return
—
-0.1%
net
10-year return
—
1.4%
net
Risk
Volatility (3y)
—
3.9%
Volatility (5y)
—
5.4%
Volatility (10y)
—
4.5%
Sharpe ratio (3y)
—
—
Sharpe ratio (5y)
—
—
Sharpe ratio (10y)
—
—
Bid/ask spread
—
—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

WBND BetaShares Global Aggregate Bond Currency Hedged ETF
  • Low-cost: a 0.19% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
  • Cheaper alternatives exist: IAF, VAF, and AGGG.
IAF iShares Core Composite Bond ETF
  • Low-cost: a 0.1% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
  • Low volatility (4.46% over 10 years) for a smoother ride.
  • Has lagged most peers over 10 years (97th of 110).

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between WBND vs IAF?

WBND and IAF are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. IAF carries the lower management fee (0.1%). Over 1 year, IAF has delivered the higher total return (-0.5% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - WBND vs IAF?

IAF has the lower management fee at 0.1% a year, versus WBND 0.19%.

Which has performed higher - WBND vs IAF?

Over the past 1 year, IAF has delivered the higher total return at -0.5% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

WBND pays the higher at 3.44%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

IAF is the larger fund by assets ($3.7bn). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?