At a glance
Side-by-side comparison
| Metric |
URNM
BetaShares Global Uranium ETF
|
ACDC
Global X Battery Tech & Lithium ETF
|
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Provider |
BetaShares
|
Global X
|
| Tracks index |
Solactive Global Uranium Pure-Play Index
|
Solactive Battery Value-Chain Index
|
| Categories |
Intl, Thematic, Commodities
|
Intl, Thematic
|
| Listed since |
2022 (4 yrs)
|
2018 (8 yrs)
|
| Fund size (AUM) |
$319m
|
$599m
|
| Cost & income | ||
| Management fee |
0.69%
|
0.69%
|
| Dividend yield |
2.67%
|
13.68%
|
| Franking |
0%
|
0%
|
| Turnover |
30%
|
35%
|
| Tax drag | 1.57% | 5.22% |
| Returns |
Tax bracket
|
|
| 1-year return |
-15.9%
net
|
13.2%
net
|
| 3-year return |
3.8%
net
|
16.4%
net
|
| 5-year return |
—
|
10.4%
net
|
| 10-year return |
—
|
—
|
| Risk | ||
| Volatility (3y) |
38.8%
|
23.7%
|
| Volatility (5y) |
—
|
21.5%
|
| Volatility (10y) |
—
|
—
|
| Sharpe ratio (3y) |
0.17
|
0.58
|
| Sharpe ratio (5y) |
—
|
0.41
|
| Sharpe ratio (10y) |
—
|
—
|
| Bid/ask spread |
—
|
—
|
marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.
Each fund at a glance
- Has lagged most peers over 1 year (301st of 318).
- Top-22% returns over 1 year (71st of 318 ETFs we track).
- High 13.68% income yield — good for investors who want regular cash flow.
- Pricier than similar ETFs, which average around 0.46%.
Frequently Asked Questions
URNM and ACDC are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. URNM carries the lower management fee (0.69%). Over 3 years, ACDC has delivered the higher total return (16.4% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.
URNM has the lower management fee at 0.69% a year, versus ACDC 0.69%.
Over the past 3 years, ACDC has delivered the higher total return at 16.4% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
ACDC pays the higher at 13.68%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.
ACDC is the larger fund by assets ($599m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.
Related comparisons
General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.