Grow it · ETFs

ACDC vs SEMI

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing ACDC and SEMI. SEMI has the lower management fee at 0.45% a year, SEMI has the higher 5 years return at 37.7% a year, and ACDC offers the higher at 13.68%.
Lower fee
SEMI 0.45% p.a.
Higher 5 years return
SEMI 37.7% p.a.
Higher yield
ACDC 13.68%
Higher risk-adjusted
SEMI Sharpe 1.01 (5y)
Lower volatility
ACDC 21.5% (5y)
Larger fund
SEMI $1.1bn

Side-by-side comparison

Metric ACDC
Global X Battery Tech & Lithium ETF
SEMI
Global X Semiconductor ETF
Snapshot
Provider
Global X
Global X
Tracks index
Solactive Battery Value-Chain Index
Solactive Semiconductor 30 Index
Categories
Intl, Thematic
Intl, Thematic, Tech
Listed since
2018 (8 yrs)
2021 (5 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)
$599m
$1.1bn
Cost & income
Management fee
0.69%
0.45%
Dividend yield
13.68%
7.35%
Franking
0%
0%
Turnover
35%
15%
Tax drag 5.22% 2.71%
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
13.2%
net
109.3%
net
3-year return
16.4%
net
60.6%
net
5-year return
10.4%
net
37.7%
net
10-year return
—
—
Risk
Volatility (3y)
23.7%
35.1%
Volatility (5y)
21.5%
34.2%
Volatility (10y)
—
—
Sharpe ratio (3y)
0.58
1.42
Sharpe ratio (5y)
0.41
1.01
Sharpe ratio (10y)
—
—
Bid/ask spread
—
—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

ACDC Global X Battery Tech & Lithium ETF
  • Top-22% returns over 1 year (71st of 318 ETFs we track).
  • High 13.68% income yield — good for investors who want regular cash flow.
  • Pricier than similar ETFs, which average around 0.46%.
SEMI Global X Semiconductor ETF
  • Top-0% returns over 3 years (1st of 236 ETFs we track).
  • High 7.35% income yield — good for investors who want regular cash flow.
  • Cheaper alternatives exist: FANG.

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between ACDC vs SEMI?

ACDC and SEMI are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. SEMI carries the lower management fee (0.45%). Over 5 years, SEMI has delivered the higher total return (37.7% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - ACDC vs SEMI?

SEMI has the lower management fee at 0.45% a year, versus ACDC 0.69%.

Which has performed higher - ACDC vs SEMI?

Over the past 5 years, SEMI has delivered the higher total return at 37.7% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

ACDC pays the higher at 13.68%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

SEMI is the larger fund by assets ($1.1bn). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?