STW vs ILC - Compare ETFs side by side

At a glance

Comparing STW and ILC. STW has the lower management fee at 0.05% a year, ILC has the higher 10 years return at 9.7% a year, and ILC offers the higher at 3.65%.

Lower fee

STW 0.05% p.a.

Higher 10 years return

ILC 9.7% p.a.

Higher yield

ILC 3.65%

Higher risk-adjusted

ILC Sharpe 0.62 (10y)

Lower volatility

ILC 13% (10y)

Larger fund

STW $6.7bn

Side-by-side comparison

Metric	STW State Street SPDR S&P/ASX 200 ETF	ILC iShares S&P/ASX 20 ETF
Snapshot
Provider	State Street	iShares
Tracks index	S&P/ASX 200 Index	S&P/ASX 20 Index
Categories	AU, Large-Cap, Market-Cap	AU, Large-Cap, Market-Cap
Listed since	2001 (25 yrs)	2010 (16 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)	$6.7bn	$803m
Cost & income
Management fee	0.05%	0.24%
Dividend yield	3.63%	3.65%
Franking	80%	78%
Turnover	3%	6%
Tax drag	0.39%	0.48%
Returns	Tax bracket - adjusts tax drag & net returns
1-year return	5.9% net	11.7% net
3-year return	10.4% net	12.6% net
5-year return	7.9% net	9.2% net
10-year return	8.9% net	9.7% net
Risk
Volatility (3y)	10.7%	10.9%
Volatility (5y)	12.4%	12.4%
Volatility (10y)	13.3%	13%
Sharpe ratio (3y)	0.6	0.77
Sharpe ratio (5y)	0.42	0.52
Sharpe ratio (10y)	0.55	0.62
Bid/ask spread	—	—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

STW State Street SPDR S&P/ASX 200 ETF

Low-cost: a 0.05% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
Pays a useful 3.63% income yield.

Cheaper alternatives exist: A300, MQAE, and A200.

Full STW analysis →

ILC iShares S&P/ASX 20 ETF

Low-cost: a 0.24% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
Pays a useful 3.65% income yield.

Cheaper alternatives exist: IOZ, STW, and VAS.

Full ILC analysis →

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between STW vs ILC?

STW and ILC are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. STW carries the lower management fee (0.05%). Over 10 years, ILC has delivered the higher total return (9.7% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - STW vs ILC?

STW has the lower management fee at 0.05% a year, versus ILC 0.24%.

Which has performed higher - STW vs ILC?

Over the past 10 years, ILC has delivered the higher total return at 9.7% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

ILC pays the higher at 3.65%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

STW is the larger fund by assets ($6.7bn). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

STW vs IOZ STW vs VAS STW vs A200 STW vs SFY STW vs A300 STW vs MQAE ILC vs SFY ILC vs VLC

← Back to all ETFs

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.