STW vs A300 - Compare ETFs side by side

At a glance

Comparing STW and A300. A300 has the lower management fee at 0.03% a year and STW offers the higher at 3.63%.

Lower fee

A300 0.03% p.a.

Higher yield

STW 3.63%

Larger fund

STW $6.7bn

Side-by-side comparison

Metric	STW State Street SPDR S&P/ASX 200 ETF	A300 Global X Australia 300 ETF
Snapshot
Provider	State Street	Global X
Tracks index	S&P/ASX 200 Index	—
Categories	AU, Large-Cap, Market-Cap	AU, Large-Cap, Market-Cap
Listed since	2001 (25 yrs)	—
Fund size (AUM)	$6.7bn	$13m
Cost & income
Management fee	0.05%	0.03%
Dividend yield	3.63%	—
Franking	80%	75%
Turnover	3%	15%
Tax drag	0.39%	0.36%
Returns	Tax bracket - adjusts tax drag & net returns
1-year return	5.9% net	—
3-year return	10.4% net	—
5-year return	7.9% net	—
10-year return	8.9% net	—
Risk
Volatility (3y)	10.7%	—
Volatility (5y)	12.4%	—
Volatility (10y)	13.3%	—
Sharpe ratio (3y)	0.6	—
Sharpe ratio (5y)	0.42	—
Sharpe ratio (10y)	0.55	—
Bid/ask spread	—	—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

STW State Street SPDR S&P/ASX 200 ETF

Low-cost: a 0.05% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
Pays a useful 3.63% income yield.

Cheaper alternatives exist: A300, MQAE, and A200.

Full STW analysis →

A300 Global X Australia 300 ETF

Low-cost: a 0.03% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.

Full A300 analysis →

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between STW vs A300?

STW and A300 are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. A300 carries the lower management fee (0.03%). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - STW vs A300?

A300 has the lower management fee at 0.03% a year, versus STW 0.05%.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

STW pays the higher at 3.63%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

STW is the larger fund by assets ($6.7bn). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

STW vs IOZ STW vs VAS STW vs A200 STW vs SFY STW vs ILC STW vs MQAE A300 vs VAS A300 vs IOZ

← Back to all ETFs

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.