Grow it · ETFs

SLVM vs MNRS

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing SLVM and MNRS. MNRS has the lower management fee at 0.57% a year and MNRS offers the higher at 7.24%.
Lower fee
MNRS 0.57% p.a.
Higher yield
MNRS 7.24%
Larger fund
MNRS $280m

Side-by-side comparison

Metric SLVM
Global X Silver Miners ETF
MNRS
BetaShares Global Gold Miners Currency Hedged ETF
Snapshot
Provider
Global X
BetaShares
Tracks index
—
Nasdaq Global ex-Australia Gold Miners Currency Hedged AUD Index
Categories
Intl, Thematic
Intl, Commodities, Thematic
Listed since
—
2016 (10 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)
$88m
$280m
Cost & income
Management fee
0.65%
0.57%
Dividend yield
—
7.24%
Franking
0%
0%
Turnover
—
25%
Tax drag — 2.92%
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
—
57.8%
net
3-year return
—
51.3%
net
5-year return
—
24.9%
net
10-year return
—
15.6%
net
Risk
Volatility (3y)
—
38.1%
Volatility (5y)
—
34.8%
Volatility (10y)
—
32.2%
Sharpe ratio (3y)
—
1.18
Sharpe ratio (5y)
—
0.72
Sharpe ratio (10y)
—
0.54
Bid/ask spread
—
—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

SLVM Global X Silver Miners ETF
  • Pricier than similar ETFs, which average around 0.46%.
MNRS BetaShares Global Gold Miners Currency Hedged ETF
  • Top-1% returns over 3 years (2nd of 236 ETFs we track).
  • High 7.24% income yield — good for investors who want regular cash flow.
  • Pricier than similar ETFs, which average around 0.46%.

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between SLVM vs MNRS?

SLVM and MNRS are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. MNRS carries the lower management fee (0.57%). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - SLVM vs MNRS?

MNRS has the lower management fee at 0.57% a year, versus SLVM 0.65%.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

MNRS pays the higher at 7.24%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

MNRS is the larger fund by assets ($280m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?