Grow it · ETFs

SFIF vs OZBD

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing SFIF and OZBD. OZBD has the lower management fee at 0.19% a year, SFIF has the higher 3 years return at 6.4% a year, and OZBD offers the higher at 4.55%.
Lower fee
OZBD 0.19% p.a.
Higher 3 years return
SFIF 6.4% p.a.
Higher yield
OZBD 4.55%
Higher risk-adjusted
SFIF Sharpe 1.5 (3y)
Lower volatility
SFIF 1.4% (3y)
Larger fund
OZBD $1.4bn

Side-by-side comparison

Metric SFIF
Seed Financial Income Fund Active ETF
OZBD
BetaShares Australian Composite Bond ETF
Snapshot
Provider
—
BetaShares
Tracks index
—
Solactive Australian Composite Bond Select Index
Categories
Bonds, AU, Active
AU, Bonds
Listed since
—
2022 (4 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)
$218m
$1.4bn
Cost & income
Management fee
0.7%
0.19%
Dividend yield
4.36%
4.55%
Franking
0%
0%
Turnover
45%
25%
Tax drag 2.48% 2.06%
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
5.1%
net
-1.1%
net
3-year return
6.4%
net
4.1%
net
5-year return
5.5%
net
—
10-year return
5.4%
net
—
Risk
Volatility (3y)
1.4%
4.7%
Volatility (5y)
1.4%
—
Volatility (10y)
4.1%
—
Sharpe ratio (3y)
1.5
0.14
Sharpe ratio (5y)
1.49
—
Sharpe ratio (10y)
0.76
—
Bid/ask spread
—
—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

SFIF Seed Financial Income Fund Active ETF
  • Pays a useful 4.36% income yield.
  • Low volatility (4.12% over 10 years) for a smoother ride.
  • Pricier than similar ETFs, which average around 0.45%.
OZBD BetaShares Australian Composite Bond ETF
  • Low-cost: a 0.19% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
  • Pays a useful 4.55% income yield.
  • Has lagged most peers over 3 years (200th of 236).

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between SFIF vs OZBD?

SFIF and OZBD are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. OZBD carries the lower management fee (0.19%). Over 3 years, SFIF has delivered the higher total return (6.4% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - SFIF vs OZBD?

OZBD has the lower management fee at 0.19% a year, versus SFIF 0.7%.

Which has performed higher - SFIF vs OZBD?

Over the past 3 years, SFIF has delivered the higher total return at 6.4% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

OZBD pays the higher at 4.55%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

OZBD is the larger fund by assets ($1.4bn). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?