Grow it · ETFs

ROBO vs ACDC

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing ROBO and ACDC. ROBO has the lower management fee at 0.69% a year, ACDC has the higher 5 years return at 10.4% a year, and ACDC offers the higher at 13.68%.
Lower fee
ROBO 0.69% p.a.
Higher 5 years return
ACDC 10.4% p.a.
Higher yield
ACDC 13.68%
Higher risk-adjusted
ACDC Sharpe 0.41 (5y)
Lower volatility
ROBO 20% (5y)
Larger fund
ACDC $599m

Side-by-side comparison

Metric ROBO
Global X ROBO Global Robotics & Automation ETF
ACDC
Global X Battery Tech & Lithium ETF
Snapshot
Provider
Global X
Global X
Tracks index
ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index
Solactive Battery Value-Chain Index
Categories
Intl, Thematic, Tech
Intl, Thematic
Listed since
2017 (9 yrs)
2018 (8 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)
$323m
$599m
Cost & income
Management fee
0.69%
0.69%
Dividend yield
10.32%
13.68%
Franking
0%
0%
Turnover
35%
35%
Tax drag 4.14% 5.22%
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
17.4%
net
13.2%
net
3-year return
14.5%
net
16.4%
net
5-year return
5.7%
net
10.4%
net
10-year return
—
—
Risk
Volatility (3y)
19.7%
23.7%
Volatility (5y)
20%
21.5%
Volatility (10y)
—
—
Sharpe ratio (3y)
0.58
0.58
Sharpe ratio (5y)
0.21
0.41
Sharpe ratio (10y)
—
—
Bid/ask spread
—
—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

ROBO Global X ROBO Global Robotics & Automation ETF
  • Top-14% returns over 1 year (46th of 318 ETFs we track).
  • High 10.32% income yield — good for investors who want regular cash flow.
  • Pricier than similar ETFs, which average around 0.48%.
ACDC Global X Battery Tech & Lithium ETF
  • Top-22% returns over 1 year (71st of 318 ETFs we track).
  • High 13.68% income yield — good for investors who want regular cash flow.
  • Pricier than similar ETFs, which average around 0.46%.

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between ROBO vs ACDC?

ROBO and ACDC are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. ROBO carries the lower management fee (0.69%). Over 5 years, ACDC has delivered the higher total return (10.4% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - ROBO vs ACDC?

ROBO has the lower management fee at 0.69% a year, versus ACDC 0.69%.

Which has performed higher - ROBO vs ACDC?

Over the past 5 years, ACDC has delivered the higher total return at 10.4% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

ACDC pays the higher at 13.68%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

ACDC is the larger fund by assets ($599m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?