Grow it · ETFs

QYLD vs NDQ

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing QYLD and NDQ. NDQ has the lower management fee at 0.48% a year, NDQ has the higher 3 years return at 24.4% a year, and QYLD offers the higher at 10.92%.
Lower fee
NDQ 0.48% p.a.
Higher 3 years return
NDQ 24.4% p.a.
Higher yield
QYLD 10.92%
Higher risk-adjusted
NDQ Sharpe 1.2 (3y)
Lower volatility
QYLD 10.9% (3y)
Larger fund
NDQ $10.5bn

Side-by-side comparison

Metric QYLD
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF
NDQ
BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF
Snapshot
Provider
Global X
BetaShares
Tracks index
—
NASDAQ-100 Index
Categories
Intl, Thematic, Dividend, Tech, US
US, Large-Cap, Tech, Growth, Market-Cap
Listed since
—
2015 (11 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)
$30m
$10.5bn
Cost & income
Management fee
0.6%
0.48%
Dividend yield
10.92%
1.42%
Franking
0%
0%
Turnover
—
15%
Tax drag 3.49% 0.81%
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
15.3%
net
17.5%
net
3-year return
12.1%
net
24.4%
net
5-year return
—
16.7%
net
10-year return
—
21.6%
net
Risk
Volatility (3y)
10.9%
16%
Volatility (5y)
—
18.1%
Volatility (10y)
—
16%
Sharpe ratio (3y)
0.73
1.2
Sharpe ratio (5y)
—
0.77
Sharpe ratio (10y)
—
1.17
Bid/ask spread
—
—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

QYLD Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF
  • Top-19% returns over 1 year (59th of 318 ETFs we track).
  • High 10.92% income yield — good for investors who want regular cash flow.
  • Pricier than similar ETFs, which average around 0.48%.
NDQ BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF
  • Top-2% returns over 10 years (2nd of 110 ETFs we track).
  • Strong risk-adjusted returns (10-year Sharpe ratio 1.17).
  • Pricier than similar ETFs, which average around 0.4%.

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between QYLD vs NDQ?

QYLD and NDQ are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. NDQ carries the lower management fee (0.48%). Over 3 years, NDQ has delivered the higher total return (24.4% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - QYLD vs NDQ?

NDQ has the lower management fee at 0.48% a year, versus QYLD 0.6%.

Which has performed higher - QYLD vs NDQ?

Over the past 3 years, NDQ has delivered the higher total return at 24.4% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

QYLD pays the higher at 10.92%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

NDQ is the larger fund by assets ($10.5bn). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?